|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In Québec
|
I know if i xover a tweeter at 4000hz it can handle more power than at 1000hz. But is there a rule other than using computer simulation ?
Daniel |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind you
|
It depends on the type of music. There are various graphs and tables floating around out there somewhere. They all give different values but will give you some idea. I'm afraid I don't have any links, but I do seem to have a graph saved here, which I have attached (I have no idea where it came from originally).
__________________
https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/ |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
In terms of heat dissipation using these graphs or look up tables will give reasonable predictions. But I believe that the Vpk requirement for the treble unit is not well predicted by these methods. Can I suggest you find some sources for the voltage drive requirement, but in the meantime try applying a factor of 2 (maybe even as high as times 3) to the voltage (=4 to 9 times the power) after choosing your xover point. Another factor affecting powerhandling is the steepness of the xover rejection out of pass band. eg. a 4pole 4kHz tweeter will accept more power than either a 2 pole or a single pole 4 kHz version. regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Actually its not up to power handling really that much with a tweeter. Yes you have the power split as shown by Mr evil, but if you look at that graph at say 2khz representing a low xover and 4khz representing a high xover the difference in the % of power it handles is only about 6%.
What its all mainly about with tweeters is where its free air resonance is and what its excursion capabilities are. The lower you cross the more excursion a tweeter requires because its having to handle more low frequency material. If the excursion goes out of the tweeters xmax distortion rises and the sound begins to deteriorate. If resonance is approached the excursion then begins to increase because of that. Ferrofluid cooled tweeters have a damped resonance and are less affected by this, tweeters like the XT25 and Scans revelator dont have ferro and are more at risk from this. Tweeters tend to have about a 10 watt (maybe more maybe less) power handleing, this means they can handle 10 watts of power. This means you can put a 10hz sine wave or 4000hz sine wave through the tweeter @ 10 watts and the tweeter will remain within its thermal limits and not fail because it gets too hot. But at 10hz the tweeter is likely to exceed its linear xmax so will sound terrible, but in this case is likely to suffer mechanical failure.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| power handling | lsutherlin | Multi-Way | 1 | 19th October 2007 10:57 PM |
| Power output vs speaker power handling | Bob0513 | Chip Amps | 4 | 5th November 2006 10:41 AM |
| power handling question | paulspencer | Multi-Way | 6 | 16th December 2003 09:33 PM |
| TL Power handling | fortyquid | Multi-Way | 9 | 13th October 2003 12:18 AM |
| Power Handling | Myren | Multi-Way | 1 | 30th October 2001 07:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09401 seconds (77.88% PHP - 22.12% MySQL) with 11 queries |