|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Coupled or uncoupled, I dont think the SQ will be effected either way. The vibrations caused by the woofer in the enclosure is of the same frequency that the woofer will be playing. If you are truely concerned about the woofers making the 2 way enclosure vibrate to hell, then use the dual opposing woofers method. put 2 woofers in the lower cabinets each and put them on oppostie sides. The inertial forces of the cones moving and air pressure created will cancel each other out for no net force. I had a subwoofer enclosure built using this method. It had two balanced tempests and 4 balanced ports. 2 ports and a woofer on each side of the enclosure. When operated at full volume I couldnt manage to get even a dime on its edge to fall. With that in mind, coupling the 2 ways is only a matter of whether or not you wish to do it. If you have any reason you'd like to seperate the 2 ways from the subs then go for a uncoupled design. Keep in mind that the amount of energy you are coupling is minimal and should have little if any effect at all on the system. It will surely not be an audible effect. Think instead about the differences between connected and unconnected speakers as far as moving the speakers, cosmetics, etc...
__________________
The golden rule of DIY: Build nice, or build twice! |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
The example I was given was more to do with sub placement than anything. If they are decoupled you can (if necessary) move the sub cabinets somewhere completely different to the smaller two ways. thus getting optimal bass response without affecting your imaging
Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lousy Anna
|
Hey Tony-
The difference is mine are not sub cabinets. Mine are woofer units. Mine cross over at 125hz and are controled by a servo controller so they do play some mid bass.
__________________
Troy Thinking positive doesn't make things better, it makes you a better person. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| capacitor coupled vs. direct coupled ouput | hugobross | Solid State | 11 | 21st January 2011 01:56 AM |
| 6sn7 direct coupled and transformer coupled | neazoi | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 23rd May 2008 03:30 PM |
| A safe (?) DC coupled amp | Fuling | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 8th July 2004 06:51 PM |
| Why AC coupled XO? | A 8 | Digital Source | 38 | 29th March 2003 02:37 PM |
| Can someone explain parafeed & direct coupled & a.c. coupled? | mwmitchell | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 11th September 2002 01:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08087 seconds (70.49% PHP - 29.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |