|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Romania
|
Can you tell me your opinions about this design ?
I want to make a back loaded horn with coaxial pro speker for use at home and powered by a small class A amplifier ( 2 - 5w / channel ) . Can you give me some help to simulate the response of this cabinet ? I have some experience to calculate simple horn but I want to know other opinions. Some specs : Driver : PAUDIO BM-12CXA Fs = 55 Hz Qms = 8.19 Qes = 0.43 Qts = 0.41 Vas = 103.54 Xmax = 3 mm SD = 510 cm Re = 5.6 ohm Z = 8 ohm Pe = 200w SPL = 100 dB/1w/1m Bl = 11.59 Cms = 0.28mm/N Mms = 29.87 g Rms = 1,26 Kg/s I want to use MDF - 19mm for this project . |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Download McBean's Horn resp program. To model a rear-loaded horn leave the rear chamber volume and length at 0; what this will give you is the predicted response of the horn only (rear wave). The front chamber volume of the program becomes the rear chamber of the actual horn. To approximate system response you combine horn output with the manufacturers standard baffle frequency response from about 100 Hz on up. The folding scheme is up to you, but don't waste a lot of effort with complicated curves or reflectors as below 200 Hz they have little if any effect as long as you keep pathways between bends less than 1/4 wavelength long (which at 100 Hz is about 2.8 feet). In fact, no reflectors is a good idea assuming you want to maximize the low pass function of the horn.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
If the wave coming down a horn section hits a bend and reflects backwards you will get a phase cancellation mode at 1/4 wavelength ( or additive mode at 1/2 wavelength). To prevent this you use an angled or curved reflector to direct the wave around the bend. But if the path section is too short for the phase shift to be of consequence then using a reflector isn't required. It's precisely the same phenomena as you get with room boundary reflections, only in this case the horn is the room.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
|
Hmmmm, interesting idea. I'm still very much learning about horns, but my quick take is that you might want to look at the BM10-CXA instead (assuming the PAudio specs are accurate) - lower Fs, higher BL and smaller Sd mean (at least I think they mean) that the horn can be rather smaller than for the 12. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.....
You've got me thinking now, dammit. I'd been intending to try Bills AutoTuba, but now I'm thinking that a corner-loaded rear horn based on the same basic idea as the AutoTuba with either the BM10CXA or even the Eminence Beta10CX might be an even better project. Arrrgh - like I need more project ideas...... |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Lower fs, higher Bl and lower Qts can be desirable, but not always. You have to tailor the driver and the horn to the desired passband. Too low an fs robs efficiency, especially in rear loaded horns where there is no ability to reactance annul to compensate. Despite the availability of programs such as Hornresp the art of horn design is still that, an art, where experience is the key ingrediant.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Thanks Bill
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Romania
|
Would be a good idea to place this B.L.H. in room corner ?
This placement will act like a bigger mouth for horn ? |
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Romania
|
Thank you Bill !
I've made some simulation and the response is very good . Some nasty peaks apear but I hope to solve that with a good dumping on thr first horn segment . What do you think ? If I will make a bigger compresion chamber , the overall response down to 60 Hz will be better ? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using PVC Pipe For A Back Loaded Horn | JimOfOakCreek | Full Range | 13 | 15th April 2008 07:30 PM |
| Back loaded horn bipoles? What? Why? | kaltsoplyn | Full Range | 6 | 19th February 2008 11:37 PM |
| Front loaded and back loaded horn | DrWoofer.com | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd August 2007 06:55 PM |
| Back loaded horn design (help please) | Puggie | Full Range | 3 | 23rd February 2006 01:08 PM |
| Back Loaded Horn Calculations | Tyimo | Multi-Way | 3 | 15th March 2005 03:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 9.21139 seconds (1.56% PHP - 98.44% MySQL) with 11 queries |