|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
For the most part a larger chamber will lower the system fb and that gives a better bottom, while also serving as a high pass filter to keep unwanted midbass and higher frequencies out of the horn. But as in all things you can overdo it. Most of the peaks you see in McBean don't turn out nearly so bad in the actual product.
Do not put any damping material in the horn; damping should only go in the chamber, and that should be fully lined to prevent any midrange reflections back to the driver cone. Damping within the horn is only required with 'quasi' horns, those that don't have a constantly expanding taper but are in fact a series of ever larger constant cross-section pipes placed end to end. These aren't true horns, and in my opinion should be avoided. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using PVC Pipe For A Back Loaded Horn | JimOfOakCreek | Full Range | 13 | 15th April 2008 07:30 PM |
| Back loaded horn bipoles? What? Why? | kaltsoplyn | Full Range | 6 | 19th February 2008 11:37 PM |
| Front loaded and back loaded horn | DrWoofer.com | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd August 2007 06:55 PM |
| Back loaded horn design (help please) | Puggie | Full Range | 3 | 23rd February 2006 01:08 PM |
| Back Loaded Horn Calculations | Tyimo | Multi-Way | 3 | 15th March 2005 03:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |