|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BC
|
Should my (mains) loudspeakers have the baffle step removed from the xover when I integrate my sub?
The sub and mains are both actively xovered at 80Hz 24db/oct. Would the integration of the speakers be easier if the step filter were removed. Has any one tried this. All views welcome. Dan |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington State, USA
|
Unless your baffles are a couple of meters wide, baffle step compensation will effect frequencies much higher than 80 Hz. So no, don't remove it.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Keep bafflestep as it will never be low enough unless you have extremely wide speakers and a high crossover point.
__________________
Red Spade Audio Blog | Writer for: Hifi Zine S3 Synergy horn + 18" active woofers + T20 horn sub + B&C active surrounds + Custom Acoustic Treatment |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
|
Or if you use the speakers very close to the backwall (good forbid), then you would do best with very little or no BSC.
/Peter |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BC
|
Thanx for the replies
My baffle is 9" Wide and 44" high. It houses two 8" drivers and one 1" tweeter. How do I calculate my 3dB point for the step filter? Dan |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Doesn't a baffle step correction circuit technically cause more loss and not actually gain by making the whole frequency range down 3db? Wouldn't using an EQ to raise the lower end instead of attenuating the top end be a better way to do things?
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 15 | 19th May 2012 03:12 PM |
| Baffle Step Compensation | Khron | Multi-Way | 4 | 16th April 2006 08:23 PM |
| baffle Step | rgrayton | Full Range | 33 | 4th December 2004 11:16 PM |
| baffle step LOSS? | madinoz | Multi-Way | 28 | 13th March 2004 10:32 AM |
| baffle step help. | AudioGeek | Multi-Way | 3 | 10th February 2004 11:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |