Any better midrange or ribbon - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th September 2004, 12:29 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Athens
Default Any better midrange or ribbon

Can this be bettered?

Raven R2 & ATC SM75-150S (in this price range)

How do the PHL midranges (1120, 1040) compare to the ATC?
How does the Excel M15CH001 compares to the ATC?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2004, 05:13 PM   #2
Mark Kravchenko
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Default There are More!!!!

How about the BG Corp products????
I've used them for about two years now and I like them allot.
Good price to performance ratio and hard to beat.

Mark
__________________
Mark
www.kravchenko-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2004, 06:04 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
I'd like to think that Accuton's concave diamond tweeter performs better than the Raven R2. Its dispersion is higher (especially in the vertical direction, though that's not always desired), and it's no slouch in the supertreble frequencies either. Distortion... who knows?

EDIT: Bah, glossed over the "in this price range".
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2004, 07:58 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Athens
Yeah but the diamond tweeter didn't make a big difference in the classic Avalon Eidolon according to the Audio.de magazin.

Anyone who have compared any of the ATC & RAVEN with other components like (PHL, EXCEL) ?

Thanks for the info BTW
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2004, 03:47 AM   #5
ScottG is offline ScottG  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
assuming you can deal with the moderate eff. of 91 db.. this is what I'd go for:

the largest of the LCY's - the 130
http://www.e-speakers.com/products/lcy-components.html

this will have a radiation pattern more consistent with a midrange and has a resonace low enough for 1st order filter above 5k

the Veravox 5 X
http://www.spectrumaudio.de/breit/ve...veravox5X.html

for a driver with an SD of a "5 inch" driver, this thing has REALLY low mms around 2.8 grams. Additionally the decay is excellent up to 5 kHz.

Of course if your not shy about prices I'd think it be pretty hard to beat the supravox field coil fullrange (at around 1,200 US), then look to Alain Ribbons (also on the e-speakers site) - note that these ribbons are the next evolution of the Raven drivers (at a stiff price).
__________________
perspective is everything
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2004, 05:50 AM   #6
Steve M is offline Steve M  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
The most tonally accurate midrange/treble I've heard (from cone spkrs, that is) is the Raven R-1 ribbon tweeter with a 4" Accuton C79-2 ceramic midrange in combination with a Cabasse 21NDC honeycomb foam bass unit (lets not forget the importance of the bass driver and the lower midrange it adds, so it is important to have a high quality bass unit if you want good midrange).

However, the 'best' midrange bar none that I've heard is the Quad ESL-57 ! (I once had four pairs of them!). Now I use the even faster Mackinlay ESL-3, see www.eraudio.com.au .

Some quick midrange comparisons are:

- ATC 3" dome (as heard in a Proac EBS)...generally excellent & very musical, but not sure it's got the detail and speed of the Accuton.

- Seas Excel magnesium drivers(as heard in a $10,000 ten driver array) ...very good but there is a 'magnesium signature'. Sound is kind of crunchy and not entirely natural IMO.

- Scanspeak carbon drivers...nice and musical but a bit wooly and not the last word in detail retrieval.

- most polypropylene mid drivers...some are nice and musical but can't keep up with Accutons and any of the above for detail retrieval, IMO.

- Fostex FE206E...wonderfully fast, alive and efficient 8" point source driver! Plug and play with no crossover in a 20L box, and cheap too at $84USD each from Madisound. Nice open sounding addictive quality, tight imaging with a room filling electrostatic-like soundstage. Best used with competent BR/TL bass augmentation. Ultimately a bit scratchy sounding though, and not as tonally accurate as the Raven/Accuton combination.

Pics of these speakers mentioned attached.

For what it's worth...

Regards,


Steve M.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg im000088.jpg (86.1 KB, 1240 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2004, 06:06 AM   #7
Steve M is offline Steve M  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Pic of Double Fostex 206E mid/treble + Active Eton 11" hexacomb bass test mule...generally excellent combination all round!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg im000737.ajpg.jpg (72.4 KB, 1152 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2004, 11:19 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Athens
THanks for the great info guys!

ScottG:
Is it true that Veravox 5 X is used in the Beauhorn B2 too?
Steve M:
Is the Accutons as musical as ATC dome?
(Here in Greece we have a dealer for the ATC and noone for Accuton)
Do you know the crossover points of the Accuton Raven Cabasse system? How was the bass of the Cabasse?
Which crossover point did you pick between the double Fostex and Eton 11"?
Does the Raven R1 have good enough vertical dispersion (due to less longer ribbon)?
Do the Eton midranges have nearly the same sound signature with the Excels (like a bit of cold sound)?
--
I really didn't like the SS Revelator 7" but I liked the 5" 15W/8530K00 and the carbon 18W/8545. How is this explained
Anyone about PHLs comprison with other components?

Thank you again for any help!
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2004, 04:10 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Athens
Also I think that Technology has changed a bit since PROAC EBS
Here's a pic of it after 1,5 hour of search:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ebs2.jpg (33.1 KB, 1085 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2004, 06:47 PM   #10
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
There are any number of Fostexes that make great midranges ... the FE108ES would be close to the top of my list (FA120 if you have more budget), and you can't leave out the Jordan JX53, JX92 & JX125.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ribbon midrange - what do we have here Telstar Planars & Exotics 22 27th March 2010 01:06 PM
OB 3-way with Alpha 15a & ribbon - what midrange driver? sharpi31 Planars & Exotics 4 16th January 2009 04:14 PM
WTB: 4" midrange and ribbon tweeters Tristanc1 Swap Meet 0 17th May 2006 07:38 AM
planar or ribbon midrange back Planars & Exotics 8 19th December 2005 04:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2