|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: england
|
friday night,
been working on these speakers for years, response is flat 20-20 ( measured and theoretical) low volume level all is ok, turn up volume, bass too loud room boost, ear loudness contour, these are the problems need simple easy circuit do you consider a cap of value? to give 100hz roll over in line with variable resistor ( not pot) to give volume control and loudness compensation will work? what i need is less bass as volume rises. last step |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Look at the Fletcher-Munson curves and you'll understand the problem: human hearing response is not linear with changes in level. Since the relative sensitivity of different frequencies across the audio bandwidth changes constantly with SPL there is no simple, easy circuit to maintain a constant response; it could be done with a digital EQ/RTA that was appropriately programmed to constantly alter the transfer function as a function of SPL.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: england
|
the fletchermunsoon i am familiar with
usually i turn it upside down to get an undersyanding of perceived freq response at given spl at present have not ventured into pure digtal processing, but friend at allen and heath did years ago. as my system stands, room gain gives flat shelf in bass from apr ox 80hz to 20hz +4.5db Thought if 6db/oct start 100hz would equate to -12 bd at 25 hz net reult -7.5db at full poweramp output leading to progression of design goal q=0.5 at flat response (((ie low volume(-6db))+4.5db room gain) -10db fletcher munson) =aprox -11.5db what do ya say? seems ok and simple |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: england
|
thought of something
you propose an amplitude modulation correction would,nt this sound like a compressor? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
What you propose is just a variation of a loudness control. It works, but very simplistically, as accurate correction would take place at minimum at the octave level, and not as a broadband filter.
Digital RTA/EQs make corrections on a 1/3 octave bandwidth. They will do what you want but have to be reset for every level. They are purely EQ devices, not compressors. One that automatically recalibrates at every volume setting to maintain a constant perception of flat response at any volume is possible but to my knowledge not yet available. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: england
|
thanks,
seems like i'll have to do some reading and build a digi thing, in the meantime probably replace preamp with tone control (aaaah!). had a good music session last night, and really the sound is fine. just looking for something new to build i guess.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
"Measured flat 20-20K"...Where? In a chamber, outside, in room at your seating position?
I think first you need to get measurements at your listening position at different volume settings. This is imperative to understand what is really happening. Have you experimented with speaker placement? Out from the wall vs against the wall will make a huge difference in bass response. Do you have any acoustic treatments in your room? This is a common pitfall of speaker builders. So much effort goes into getting a speaker perfect only to find out they never put it in the real world where room and placement have a huge effect on frequency response. You've spent years getting your speakers right, but how much time getting your room right?
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
So, why place a great reliance on quasi-anechoic measurements? Are they really necessary other than to produce a set of measurements for comparison purposes?
The speakers are going to be used in room, so for the DIYer, why not always measure in room, right from the get-go? Mos |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| room gain? | garymck | Subwoofers | 46 | 29th March 2010 01:51 PM |
| db, gain, and loudness. Simple math | Pbassred | Multi-Way | 16 | 8th November 2005 04:13 PM |
| Room gain | Vikash | Multi-Way | 31 | 13th March 2004 11:10 AM |
| Room gain | Raka | Multi-Way | 6 | 16th September 2003 09:13 AM |
| Room Gain | Ignite | Multi-Way | 5 | 12th March 2003 02:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09830 seconds (79.45% PHP - 20.55% MySQL) with 10 queries |