|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
The slot is based on a method for slotting a resonant tube (whistle) to make its output more like white noise than centered on a particular frequency.
The slot doesn't do anything at bass frequencies. Karlson's are just really big vented boxes for high efficiency woofers, and they excel at making lots of 40+Hz bass. Paul Klipsch measured these (investigation of a competitor at the time) and he had a couple funny quotes about them.... These measurements are out on the net somewhere. The cavity resonances at ~200Hz+ created by the slot and the space behind are really bad: like +/-10+ dB There is a guy on the Audio Asylum sites named Freddyi who seems to love these things if you want another opinion about them...
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: deep south
|
Quote:
And then on the other hand we have a bona fide poster from the karlson Page. Hi E.Lectronic. freddyi who hangs around High Efficiency at AA, and over at the Full range driver forum has made a number of posts on Karlsons - I don't know how many he has actually built - I guess you're going to have to take your best shot and let us know - but if it were me looking at it, I would want to be sure of solutions to the frequency deviation and phasing problems before starting construction -
__________________
No longer powered by Linux - not enough apps and cross platform integration - but maybe one day |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ocean, NJ
|
Yeah, Freddy knows more about Karlsons than I do by a far stretch, and he owns several different pair of them of varying size -I believe 8" up to 15" (driver size).
I'm in the process of building my first pair of K-8 cabs modified with the tweaks I mentioned in my earlier post. It's definitely a challenge to attempt to correct it's shortcomings, but I believe it can be done. I mean if you break it down into it's basic components its just a bass reflex box (easy) with an exponential coupler front chamber for the higher frequencies. When you look at it that way, it's really easy to conceptualize design. About the Karlson not producing really deep bass, that has not been my experience at all. The 15" Ultra Fidelity Karlsons I own put out some of the best, most effortless and "alive" bass I've ever heard from a speaker and that includes those soffit mounted TADs in the recording studio I interned at many years ago. Don't get me wrong, it isn't that I'm saying the TADs aren't way better speakers, but there's something about the Karlson that makes the response of the driver very fast and punchy. It takes me one step closer to feeling like I'm in the same room with the musicians. Now, granted, Ron E. is correct about the slot not doing much for deep bass. The way I understand it, physics dictates that the slot would have to flare out to a width that would accomodate the wavelength of the lowest frequency produced in order to be useful. But, the perceived bass is different because of the slot's effect on harmonics of the bass frequencies. The actual bass frequencies are affected by the bass reflex design of the rear chamber. Thus the bass can go as low as any other vented enclosure, and K15's are pretty big, so they can produce some impressive lows. And who knows, maybe there is an advantage to the extra loading of the front chamber? Freddyi might have some ideas about that. As far as measurements go, many of the "Karlsonites" -as we call ourselves on that page- have measured their cabs to pretty low and impressive frequencies at very good SPLs. I'll have to ask Freddyi. He's the real number man. The fact that many people use their Ks as subwoofers or Bass guitar cabs speaks highly for their bass response. I'll see what info I can dredge up from some of the others on these issues and get back to you. In the meantime, I recommend to anyone interested to visit the Karlson Speaker Project, read some of the posts and articles and chat with the locals. If nothing else, it's a design that I believe was ahead of it's time in many ways and is worth investigating just for it's curiosity. -Erik (slightly Krazy "Karlsonite")
__________________
-Who put the Tribbles in the Quadrotriticale? |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Hi all !
Karlson is a very intresting enclosure type and an acoustic tool for us. Here is a great Karlson-site (maybe the best in this subject): http://home.planet.nl/~ulfman/ And here is the theory: http://home.planet.nl/~ulfman/theory.htm It is basically a TL, an air column resonator, but it is not a regular simple-TL, cause it have a special exponential cut on it, and therefore it acts like a broadband-resonator cause it works like a lot of TL pipe paralell with different lengths and opening areas. Have somebody own experiences from practice with this ? Not with the conventional reflex-Karlson with the "curtain", but a normal TL with an axponential cut like on the figure. Theoretically everything that improves something, should have some drawbacks too. Now then, what could be the penalty to use this kind of smoothing ? Maybe the overall output level decreases related to the regular straight TL at the same time, cause the karlson cut increases the acoustic shortcut at low freqs a little bit ? Waiting for your comments ! Thanks ! Regards !
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Nobody interest this thread ?
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
with 150mm plastic pipe about 1.2 meters tall, baffle down the middle, so it's folded, & 4" drivers,
it worked really well for me, but I haven't measured the result. Plenty of low end (I bi-amped with chip amplifiers, xover @ 150 Hz) I'll post a pic when I get back to my usual computer... I'd like to try again with good drivers and bigger pipe, but too many other projects at present.... Pete McK |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Thanks, and waiting for your pics! Roughly how can you descript them ?
How does they sound, how deep they goes, benefits/drawbacks, other details ? Is the tweeter also behind the pipe, like in this design ? http://snkby.50megs.com/index.html |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
All my drivers are on the baffle, which is down the middle of the pipe. The top of the pipe behind the baffle is closed off. The baffle goes all the way down the middle except for a gap of 150mm at the bottom, so essentially its a folded pipe, loading the rear of the drivers.
The K slot is cut down one side of the pipe opposite the fronts of the drivers, so they can radiate into the room. How do they sound...well, not having measured, this is subjective, but they sound very different from my stereo speakers (I'm using them for TV/HT sound - got 100% SAF :-) (even though i think they could be made to look a lot better). Plenty of lows for such small drivers & 5W amp; the pipes seem to have a gradual roll off which gives the impression of more bass when augmented by the pipe resonances. I don't know how the transient response of these would measure, (for TV it doesn't matter to me), and I'm sure the slot has an effect on the radiation pattern. Of necessity, I have placed on either side of the room, (not ideal) and seem to sound best when aimed to cross over in front of the listening position by quite a bit. The drivers I used were just odd 'no-name' units I had lying around, that's why I'd like to try again with better & bigger drivers, the sound is good enough that I'm convinced the approach has merit. I've got a pair of high q 10" drivers which might be good, however, I've been seduced by OBs in the meantime....Pete McK |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
here ya go.... I'd do the slot a bit different next time though...
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portal 2012
|
Quote:
The slot when used properly with a tuned front and back chamber will give you a 3-6 db gain 50-250 Hz. It also eliminates floor dip and baffle step which in turn will give you much stronger and linear bass response with higher efficiency and lower distortion over reflex, sealed, open baffle, transmission line designs. For midbass I have yet to find a configuration that sounds better - straight expo and hypex horns are close but are not as linear and take up much more room. In my experiance my Karlson type Klams will easily outperform Klipschorns in the bass - no +-10 db dips here even with 1/16 octave resolution. Klipsch was one of the first great bullshitters of audio. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| when are you going to try Karlson? | freddi | Full Range | 2 | 20th November 2007 08:45 PM |
| What to put on top of a Karlson? | Illusus | Multi-Way | 0 | 25th October 2007 03:10 AM |
| Karlson enclosure for Altec 416z | theophile | Multi-Way | 6 | 15th August 2007 03:53 AM |
| Karlson K 15 | jwklbm | Full Range | 1 | 28th November 2006 05:36 PM |
| Karlson's enclosure | freddi | Multi-Way | 2 | 10th November 2006 03:21 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |