|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
|
basically, what would be the results on this design box? as opposed to having a divider between the ports? also, what would be the result if only one woofer was driven? its going in a car, and having a divider would look ugly. THANX!!!
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
That will work but you need to have the 2 port combine more fluidly like with a divider at the initial junction of the ports. As is, with the air moving in opposite directions where they meet, significant turbulence will result. This could result in noise from the port and other problems related to port tuning.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
|
When i saw the 'blah blah' i thought skinnyboy would be involved
The unpowered speaker will act like a PR if its undriven wont it? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Yes, the undriven driver would act as a PR, but not a very good one. Since only one driver would be energized the total driver Vas would be halved, which means the cabinet would be double the size that it should be, while the second cone acting as a PR would drop the box frequency by perhaps another octave. The Fb would be so far below spec that the remaining speaker would not work well at all.
For the size box you're ending up with in this scenario I wouldn't do it, unless they are stereo woofers operating into the midrange. Using two boxes will give only an additional 6dB output, and you can get a lot more than that from the same size box by going with a horn loaded design instead, assuming this is a sub and that the drivers are at least 10s. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
|
Bill F,have you ever consided growing a FAQ page for people who ask questions like this?
Ive considered starting a basshorn walkthrough which others could add to. Its always a considerable task,but perhaps it will save some effort. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
|
thanx for the input guys, it was for in a car, but I think I'll go with sealed anyway....
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
|
I've made a few enclosures along those lines before, including one with the drivers facing each other (like in a tripple chamber bandpass)
They work quite well, very little port noise. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Its always better to slave the transport blah blah blah | regal | Digital Line Level | 60 | 23rd October 2009 02:03 PM |
| Problem witht [code]blah[/code] ? | elseif | Forum Problems | 1 | 17th August 2008 12:30 AM |
| Help please - Sub sounds *blah* | cbecker33 | Subwoofers | 9 | 26th October 2006 01:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09680 seconds (79.57% PHP - 20.43% MySQL) with 11 queries |