Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd August 2004, 01:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Default speaker surgery: reduce winding height

In an active configuration where one does not care too much about absolute sensitivity, it might be attractive distortionwise to reduce the number of turns, i.e. change an overhung design to underhung or make an underhung one more underhung. The other downsides are even lower impedance (which I am assuming the amp can handle) and possible more power compression (which could be countered with current drive).

Specifically, a midrange with 6 mm gap and 8 mm winding height might be better off with just 2-4 mm winding height.

How does one go about this surgery? Unwinding turns definitely forces one to remove the VC and hence spider and surround. Besides, there is the danger of deforming the former. I wondered if it would be possible to put a scratch into the isolation of the outer (top and bottom) turns and short-circuit them with some solder. In some very open designs such as Seas or Vifa XT, this would be possible without taking the speaker apart.

Issues:
- mass stays the same
- outer windings act as short circuit brake: I am not sure whether this is a disadvantage, some PA drivers to this to limit overexcursion, and I read that this reduces distortion (which I profoundly doubt!)
- it would be impossible to apply this technique to the buried layers of multilayer VCs, but I think if the shorted top windings acts as a short circuit to AC fields, they will effectively short circuit the lower layers also


What do you think?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2004, 07:49 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
Default Re: speaker surgery: reduce winding height

Quote:
Originally posted by capslock
In an active configuration where one does not care too much about absolute sensitivity, it might be attractive distortionwise to reduce the number of turns, i.e. change an overhung design to underhung or make an underhung one more underhung....

...Specifically, a midrange with 6 mm gap and 8 mm winding height might be better off with just 2-4 mm winding height.
Fewer turns in the gap should lead not only to lower sensitivity, but higher Qes, Qts, (and eventually Qtc), as well.

Since you don't care that much about sensitivity, perhaps you can compensate for this with enclosure design.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yamaha Surgery jackinnj Everything Else 5 15th July 2009 05:12 PM
Speaker has a bit too much energy at 500Hz, how to reduce this Tino Multi-Way 7 7th May 2009 04:01 PM
What is the best way to reduce speaker cabinet volume andy2 Multi-Way 36 30th October 2008 01:51 PM
Is there a way to reduce brightness of a speaker thermonuclear Car Audio 11 22nd October 2007 03:19 AM
Speaker voicecoil winding rjb Multi-Way 2 24th July 2007 11:10 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Page generated in 0.09257 seconds (66.27% PHP - 33.73% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio