|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
fires completely into 2pi space?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mad Dog, Texas
|
divide the speed of sound by 2 meters
340/2=170 170Hz give or take depending on air pressure and temperature more or less |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Hmm, 'sound is round', so assuming a round baffle to keep it simple and SoS = 344.424m/sec, then as a rough approximation: 344.424/pi/2 = ~54.82Hz/F3, but there's a terminus end correction of radius*0.613 that needs to be accounted for: 344.424/pi/(2+(2/2*0.613) = ~41.96Hz.
If F6 is what you're looking for, then it is 1/2 octave away, or 41.96*0.707 = ~29.66Hz. Or just use Linkwitz's formula for F6: (0.17*344.424)/2 = ~29.28Hz. I assume the inaudible discrepency is due to him rounding the numbers off a bit in his lumped sum value. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
|
So...so far we got 144Mhz, 170Hz, and 42Hz. Anyone else????
![]() You know how this scientific stuff is "Industry, science, and technology! Big men putting screwdrivers into things! Turning them! And adjusting them!"
__________________
I enjoy my organic shapes..... |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
|
F3 of 42Hz and fully into 2pi at 170Hz is pretty close. However, this is all theory. With these kinds of frequencies in a room, you will probably get completely different results due to roomgain and standing waves.
__________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. --- Douglas Adams |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
![]() rcavictim Your comments are inappropriate for this forum, and not required here, so I have removed them to Texas. Please behave from now on or further action will be taken.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cool end of a soldering iron NW of Toronto
|
Quote:
__________________
I.Q.Test. Have you ever purchased a recreational snowmobile? |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
Hmm, obviously I was not thinking in terms of F0 WRT 2pi space radiation, but it would be 1/2 octave above F3, or 1.414*~41.96 = ~59.33Hz, so I don't see how ~170Hz or any other frequency 'up' to 'infinite' can be correct, especially since 'infinite' as I understand the term = DC. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| B20's, sealed, wide vs narrow baffle? | 2litre | Full Range | 15 | 21st March 2010 08:30 PM |
| Fr125S: wide or narrow baffle | bro | Full Range | 28 | 1st November 2006 09:15 PM |
| Possible wide baffle project | Scottmoose | Full Range | 6 | 25th September 2005 01:16 PM |
| narrow vs wide baffle and port location....? | AudioGeek | Multi-Way | 3 | 9th May 2004 09:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |