|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
about how much voume does polyfill add? I want to stuff a sealed enclosure enouf to make up for the 2 braces i want to put in.
__________________
- |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
A fully stuffed box equates to about a 20% increase in sealed box volume. I've seen a number of posters here say that their experience is that stuffing is bad. I wouldn't think that a couple of braces would affect your Q enough to worry about for a sealed cab.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
|
I have an Adire DPL12 in a 2.4 cubic foot sealed box and just recently stuffed it completely. The results were not good. It lost SPL and slam factor. So, I opened it back up and removed some stuffing and now it is about 1/2 full like it always was before. The SPL and slam came back. When I was testing it, I had no stuffing in it, and it had even more slam. I might go back to that if I feel like opening it back up. So, in my experience, stuffing was bad.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Stuffing is bad in a sub, and unnecessary. The wavelengths reproduced in a sub are unaffected by stuffing and do not require attenuation within the box as they are too long compared to the box dimensions for standing waves to develop. The idea of using stuffing to increase apparant box size is a carryover from the pre-T/S days and really does not apply to subs. Stuffing/lining is a must for frequencies from about 300 Hz and up.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Yup, I agree with Bill here. If you just stick with the braces you should be fine, as small changes in volume ( c. +-10%) don't really affect response significantly.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
this isnt for a sub, it is for a 2 way thats sealed and i dont have any acoustic foam for it. So will stuffing be fine?
__________________
- |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Oops, I misunderstood
Yes, that should be fine, I would start at around 50% fill, then add or subtract until it sounds good.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brisbane
|
I recently stuffed my 3" satellite (multimedia) speakers with polyfill. With reguards to it change the effective volume, I dont perceive the volume to have changed at all. It just seems like it absorbs harmonic resonances within the enclosure giving a more crisp and defined sound.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
That's precisely what you should be hearing; the stuffing prevents reflected waves inside the box from going back to the cone to cause dips and bumps in response. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
So what is it about stuffing that takes away slam from subs? I can't see what theory would support the subjective comment!
If it's a sealed subwoofer, then it lowers the Q, which should be a good thing! From a fidelity point of view. Perhaps this perceived loss of slam is actually greater accuracy. As I understand, a lower Q will often mean better transient response, by making the box appear bigger. I can't see why stuffing a sub should be considered a "pre TS parameters thing." I have heard that stuffing is not a good idea for a vented box. However, if the vent is not blocked and it is partially stuffed, I'm not sure what effect it might have. I can see the point however, that small changes in box volume aren't that significant for a sealed sub - the response changes very little. It is more a question of transient response I believe.
__________________
AUDIO BLOG | Bass integration guide My work: www.redspade.com.au web design studio |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mucho Polyfill affect Sealed Sub Q? | jdgonko | Subwoofers | 15 | 23rd December 2007 08:09 AM |
| How wattage adds....HELP! | Shpoop | Multi-Way | 23 | 28th June 2007 07:47 AM |
| What is 'polyfill' stuffing? | JoeM | Multi-Way | 23 | 9th October 2006 09:56 PM |
| How much polyfill? | mazeroth | Multi-Way | 6 | 31st December 2004 02:21 AM |
| weird adds | karma | Everything Else | 0 | 6th June 2004 10:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15523 seconds (72.18% PHP - 27.82% MySQL) with 10 queries |