|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: .
|
I have been thinking it could be possible to make a drivers magnet bigger by placing another magnet around the existing one and therefore improving (perhaps) its midrange response. This lower the Qt a little bit, give away some LF response. I would use it with the Fostexfe206e on a 250HZ front horn.
If it is worthwhile, then one (I suppose) would have to center it correctly on the existing stucture. Any comments? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Probably not - before you go to all that trouble, you might try modeling it in FEMM to see if you'll actually gain any additional BL.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
I'm going to try this;
I have a pair of old 60's 6" 15 ohm units with a small magnet, and another pair of 8" units which have stuffed cones; they have large magnets, and the centre pole can be removed easily, and the so the magnets will fit over the magnets of the smaller units. I'm going to bolt the frame of the larger units over the top of the smaller ones to see what effect the increased field has. This will be an OB project... Pete McK |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ontario
|
I've seen one or two cases where an additional magnet was stacked on the existing one.
http://www004.upp.so-net.ne.jp/tsucchiy/jisaku5.html Unofortunately there's no comment as to how the sound changed in this case. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oxford
|
North Creek music, have been upgrading the magnets on the expensive high performance scan speak mid/bass drivers for many years, from the data they provide and the general comments there are it seems to work very well.
http://www.northcreekmusic.com/Drivers/Drivers.html at the bottom of the this link you can see the modifications that are made to the drivers. Hesky |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Editor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
|
Hesky,
I don't see any statement that they modify the drivers themselves. there is a model with a stacked magnet, but from what they say it could well come from the factory that way. Am I missing something? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: cosmological consciousness
|
It does help but its not that effective as it looks.
For a second magnet to be most effective it should be on the inside of the yoke plate this adds its own problems but will give a high BL. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
What about field coils?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
If the poles of the magnetic circuit are saturated are at the
gap (this is a very desirable feature) then there is no point in simply adding more magnet, it will have very limited effect, even if you could get the magnet inside the magnetic circuit which generally you can't. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: cosmological consciousness
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fostex FE206E | gus6464 | Full Range | 4 | 13th December 2008 09:39 PM |
| WTD: Fostex FE206E | woodturner-fran | Swap Meet | 0 | 22nd April 2008 12:19 AM |
| Fostex FE206E vs FE166E | Uchi Deshi | Full Range | 4 | 9th June 2006 08:05 PM |
| Fostex Fe206e BackHorn ? | pa | Full Range | 5 | 21st September 2004 06:13 PM |
| Zen amp and Fostex FE206E | broadcast guy | Swap Meet | 3 | 10th June 2004 01:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13109 seconds (74.92% PHP - 25.08% MySQL) with 10 queries |