|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Hey, I think we can maybe come up with something here
I really wouldn't push the TW034X0 as far down as 1k, especially if you are to be playing it at high SPL. A quick rule of thumb is that you should cross over no lower than double Fs, so 1.6k in this case. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bristol
|
Quote:
My pair would be to replace my crappy current mains. The tweeter is dead in one and going in the other. Quote:
I’m thinking mostly medium SPL. My amplifier is supposedly 35W RMS per channel so I think the 70W rating on the TW034X0 will be ok. I’ve never managed to get the volume past ~1/5th of the way round, and this is deafening to listen to. Not knowing the sensitivity of my mains, I cannot gage the SPL, so I don’t know what "high" is. [edit]: When writing a message, it is so hard to get back into programming mode and check the coding.
__________________
If it aint broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, fix it. If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked". |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Just wondering why you need 10 inchers in what I assume is your bedroom. You could get nicer sound with smaller drive units and, as you already have a sub the deep stuff isn't a problem.
Alternatively, you could make a pair of 10 inchers and ditch the sub. Of course, you could be like me and like a big, projecting soundstage, and I find that the larger drive units seem to do that better. If I were you I would like to experiment with crossover frequencies to find the best choice. I find that moving it up the range (to maybe 4-5k) brings the vocals out into the room, but at the expense of off-axis response and risk of harshness from breakup. You need to choose the drive unit well in this application. Are you able to scavenge any of those chip amps you had and then you could build an active system? Active makes it much faster, easier and cheaper to experiment. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bristol
|
Quote:
I dont know about soundstage, but im a basshead so i want as much bass as possible without it sounding horrible. Also, with a larger driver, the LF cutoff point is lower, so I can cross it over with the sub lower. Yes, I am going active, or at least making a load of active line lever crossovers as they will be cheaper than high level ones. This way I can also make them variable, as you suggested and ajust it until I like it. What driver would you suggest? Are you definatly going with the AP210Z0?
__________________
If it aint broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, fix it. If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked". |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I would look at speakers smaller than 10 inch if I were you, especially if you have a decent sub.
My comment earlier about crossing over at 4-5k is obviously dependent on the main drive unit. This would be too high for a 10 inch unit, but OK for a 5 inch unit. I'd say no more than 3k for a 10 inch unit. With a larger drive unit the F3 point is usually lower (not always), but the box requirements are also scaled up. I'm glad you are going active, it makes things a lot easier. As I mentioned in a recent post in this thread, the Audax 8 inch units are not up to much and I am looking into alternatives. I would stay away from PA type drive units as they usually have poor specs in relation to hi-fi use, i.e. high Fs. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
|
You're being a bit unfair to say the Audax AP210Z0 units aren't up to much. They have a low FS but also a very low Qtc, so the bass rolls off quite early in a sealed box, but as the slope is slow, it will tolerate bass boost without getting to sound uncontrolled.
I would rather have a low Qt woofer with an electronic amplitude compensation network in place of a high Qtc woofer any day. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bristol
|
Quote:
__________________
If it aint broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, fix it. If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked". |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bristol
|
Ok, i have modeled a load of drivers that look ok... Going to my maths exam now...
__________________
If it aint broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, fix it. If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked". |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Budget Active nearfeild monitor: Edifier R1200 | DcibeL | Parts | 0 | 18th February 2009 05:38 PM |
| T-amp, too loud, too soon | Mr.Mekulic | Class D | 16 | 27th October 2006 04:40 PM |
| efficient (loud) 'monitor'/bookshelf designs for 5.1 | Puggie | Multi-Way | 0 | 30th May 2006 10:17 AM |
| The A4 monitor, best mini monitor? | KURT | Multi-Way | 5 | 26th April 2005 01:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14950 seconds (76.91% PHP - 23.09% MySQL) with 11 queries |