|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kalifornia
|
Is ~3" an adequate distance from the back wall of my sub box to the port?
TIA Mitch |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
What's the target SPL, and is the port flared?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kalifornia
|
I didn't plan on using a flared port, although I gather it would help immensly.
But I'm shooting for about a F3 of 19Hz, at around 109db. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
|
As a general rule, I would leave at least one port dia. distance away from the back wall. If you port dia. is 4", leave at least 4" from the wall.
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.) |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
I leave three times the port size from the wall or it will continue to act as one large port of an unknown legth.
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
|
In a quick search, a number of manufacturers suggest placement similar to Vikash at about one port diameter. I must admit that, intuitively, this seems wrong to me. Particularly considering the air velocity for 109db @ 19Hz in a 3" port will approach 30ft/sec. (this is also an argument that velocity and not acceleration is more directly responsible for SPL, but that's a different discussion.)
I think I would consider a larger port if possible. I would be very interested to hear an explenation on how you can place the port so close to a wall and not adversely affect its output.
__________________
Rodd Yamashita |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
The critical distance is when the the CSA of the port
circumference to the wall = the CSA of the port. This occurs when the spacing is 1/4 of the port diameter. So I agree with Vikash, and have to disagree with MarkP. And to answer Roddyama's query with a spacing of 1 port diameter away from the wall the acoustic impedance change at the exit of the port is only slightly affected. Note that there is a huge change in air velocity at the exit. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
__________________
Rodd Yamashita |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Well its only 2pi for half effective baffle width, after that its 4pi, given free space. For close to wall its ~ 2pi above baffle width. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Uneven distance from back wall? | Lewis Moon | Multi-Way | 0 | 5th October 2008 10:12 PM |
| dipole midrange or subwoofer, distance with wall ? | mbon | Multi-Way | 34 | 2nd August 2004 06:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10300 seconds (74.41% PHP - 25.59% MySQL) with 10 queries |