|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
|
Designing a three way with L shaped bass cab (it will be once mid and tweet cabs are inside).
How would you most effectively calculate standing waves to determine acceptable dimensions for my L shaped enclosure?
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.) |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nr London
|
Instead of an L-shape, why not make separate cabinets for the bass and the mids? I too am building a 3 way at the moment, and am using separate enclosures a la Wilson X-1 for the bass and the mid/treble. The bass enclosure is designed so that the first standing wave is above the crossover between the drivers, and the mid/treble is totally overstuffed with acoustic foam to kill any box resonances in it's operating range.
Now I have the tricky task of eliminating panel resonances
__________________
Mark The king of all that is evil has left the building |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I thought the same thing. Enclose the mid, tweets are usually sealed these days. Use the remaining volume for the woofer. I think that keeps it simpler.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
The whole cab as if it were straight for the LF BW up to the frequency where the long vertical dim. is 2x its length. For the base of the "L", its 1st eigenmode begins at 2x its longest dim.
Since it's doubtful you will find a good compromise, just concentrate on the 'pipe' as a whole and use damping material at the top, one side, and back to attenuate the higher frequency eigenmodes. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
You want to totally line the woofer section. While damping material is unnecessary below 100 Hz, above that it's hard to use too much. As was suggested go with a sealed sub-enclosure on the mid and the same for the tweeter (unless either or both has a sealed basket) and fully line the woofer section with an inch of high density polyfill.
The idea of supressing 'standing waves' is fallacious; there's really no such thing inside of a speaker cabinet. But you do want to be sure there are no reflective surfaces inside off of which midbass and higher frequencies can reflect back to the cone, which would cause response anomalies. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Minimising standing waves | GerhardW | Multi-Way | 13 | 2nd September 2008 07:43 PM |
| Standing waves, anyone willing to experiment ? | jay1st | Multi-Way | 4 | 10th February 2008 01:33 AM |
| Low resonance and standing waves? | Audist | Multi-Way | 3 | 6th November 2005 03:29 AM |
| Golden ratios and standing waves | Vikash | Multi-Way | 36 | 27th September 2003 02:12 AM |
| curved enclosures/standing waves | RobWells | Multi-Way | 8 | 1st August 2003 02:28 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |