What connection method to bypass internal xover and go active? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd June 2004, 09:09 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Default What connection method to bypass internal xover and go active?

The speakers in question are the Audax-CC-as-fronts that I am building, discussed in an older thread, thanks to sreten.

I have all the passive xover components, but I think I would like to go active with these with the MOX boards from the group buy, yet still retain the passive xovers within the speaker.

I am wondering if someone has some slick techniques for switching the xover in and out of the speaker connections. By slick I don't necessarily mean an elaborate switching system, maybe just a matter of good parts placement for the sake of neatness.

I don't remember coming across this; it seems like most people just open up the speaker and modify the connections on a semi-permanent basis.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2004, 09:48 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
BobEllis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
if you don't expect to go back and forth too often, why not just mount the crossover so that you can easily reach it through the woofer hole, leave the binding post to XO leads long enough to attach to the drivers (assuming that you are set up to biwire) and solder the conenction as appropriate.

The less audiophile correct solution would be to use spade quick connect terminals and swap the lead positions as appropriate. Hey, you could do this until you decide which implimentation you like better, then solder in place.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2004, 10:04 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
You really need to make a decision which it's going to be. Even if you added extra binding posts on the outside of the cabinet going directly to the drivers the passive crossover components are only partially bypassed, and they will still have influence over the circuit.
On the other hand, bi- or tri-amping with an active crossover is so sonically superior to a single amp with passive crossover there's no reason to look back anyway.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cambride sw bypass built in xover 8cube Subwoofers 0 28th October 2007 05:19 PM
can you bypass internal crossover on BASH plate amp? thadman Solid State 2 2nd December 2006 09:16 AM
Behringer DCX2496 I want to try active biamping using it as the active xover. georgehifi Digital Line Level 3 15th August 2006 08:46 AM
Bypass of the internal opamp of a dac : missed 00940 Digital Source 6 5th July 2004 07:36 PM
active xover 5th element Solid State 0 9th March 2003 08:19 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2