|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
The speakers in question are the Audax-CC-as-fronts that I am building, discussed in an older thread, thanks to sreten.
I have all the passive xover components, but I think I would like to go active with these with the MOX boards from the group buy, yet still retain the passive xovers within the speaker. I am wondering if someone has some slick techniques for switching the xover in and out of the speaker connections. By slick I don't necessarily mean an elaborate switching system, maybe just a matter of good parts placement for the sake of neatness. I don't remember coming across this; it seems like most people just open up the speaker and modify the connections on a semi-permanent basis.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
|
if you don't expect to go back and forth too often, why not just mount the crossover so that you can easily reach it through the woofer hole, leave the binding post to XO leads long enough to attach to the drivers (assuming that you are set up to biwire) and solder the conenction as appropriate.
The less audiophile correct solution would be to use spade quick connect terminals and swap the lead positions as appropriate. Hey, you could do this until you decide which implimentation you like better, then solder in place. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
You really need to make a decision which it's going to be. Even if you added extra binding posts on the outside of the cabinet going directly to the drivers the passive crossover components are only partially bypassed, and they will still have influence over the circuit.
On the other hand, bi- or tri-amping with an active crossover is so sonically superior to a single amp with passive crossover there's no reason to look back anyway. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| cambride sw bypass built in xover | 8cube | Subwoofers | 0 | 28th October 2007 04:19 PM |
| can you bypass internal crossover on BASH plate amp? | thadman | Solid State | 2 | 2nd December 2006 08:16 AM |
| Behringer DCX2496 I want to try active biamping using it as the active xover. | georgehifi | Digital Line Level | 3 | 15th August 2006 07:46 AM |
| Bypass of the internal opamp of a dac : missed | 00940 | Digital Source | 6 | 5th July 2004 06:36 PM |
| active xover | 5th element | Solid State | 0 | 9th March 2003 07:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10259 seconds (57.74% PHP - 42.26% MySQL) with 10 queries |