|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
There is the pic
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near Baltimore, MD
|
Wouldn't you need a more defined compression chamber?
I like that it is non parallel, but the transition from the compression chamber to the throat of the horn would have to be more abrupt, no? GND
__________________
I had the right to remain silent. I just didn't have the ability. (Comedian Ron White) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
The concept is fine but you don't need to go to the trouble of using curved surfaces with a rear loaded horn. Curved bends are critical to smooth response above 300-400 Hz or so, but those aren't the frequencies that your horn will be passing. With the long wavelengths that the rear loaded horn passes curved surfaces are of no advantage. They don't hurt, but they don't help either.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I’m using it curved because I'm planning to build the enclosure in MDF layers and sandwich them together the only problem will be the weight.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
That's fine. although you may find bending MDF a major chore. Curved surfaces have the advantage of being very vibration resistant, but you still may find the effort not worth the benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
>Wouldn't you need a more defined compression chamber?
I like that it is non parallel, but the transition from the compression chamber to the throat of the horn would have to be more abrupt, no? ==== For the appropriate BW, no, no. What matters is net Vb, St. That said, if the drawing is reasonably accurate, the rear chamber is much too large, St too small, and the pathlength way too short to perform well. Better to stick it in a tweaked 825/828 design, or probably best, a chopped down 210/211 with a 416 helper woofer. A pair of these would suffice for an art house cinema. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
where can I find the 825/828 design and the 210/211 design
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is This cabinet enclosure? Altec? | superjunk | Multi-Way | 0 | 21st April 2009 03:14 PM |
| Karlson enclosure for Altec 416z | theophile | Multi-Way | 6 | 15th August 2007 03:53 AM |
| Which enclosure for Altec 409-8B | edlye | Full Range | 31 | 7th July 2007 03:11 PM |
| Hedlund Horn / Coaxial ?? | jcmjrt | Multi-Way | 0 | 29th December 2006 10:31 PM |
| Coaxial altec/jbl/jensen/etc for 2'' CD?? | cathode_leak | Multi-Way | 6 | 6th June 2005 05:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10991 seconds (76.76% PHP - 23.24% MySQL) with 11 queries |