|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
For a 4 1/2" driver?
What's the good and bad on doing that? Curious Cal |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Editor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
|
There is a guy already that makes a miniature A7 using smaller drivers. I suppose you know about this?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hmmm........
It depends what you mean by 1/4 scale ........ Cone area will be ~ 1/16 of the full size cabinet but the cabinet internal volume will be 1/64 of the full size cabinet so something has to give, basically bass extension. A full 2 octaves of bass extension for the same efficiency. Or lose 18dB of efficiency for the same bass extension. A compromise would be to lose one octave of bass and 9dB efficiency. Due to scale the c/o frequency goes up two octaves. My idea of 1/4 scale would be 1/4 the cone area, i.e. an 8". So cabinet dimensions would be halved and internal volume would be 1/8 the full size speaker. If you accept a reduction of 6dB in sensitivity you'd only lose a 1/3 of an octave of bass extension. Due to scale the c/o frequency would double, up one octave. So nominal specs would be : 44Hz to > 22Khz c/o 1.8KHz ~ 100W 93dB/W 15 x 12 x 27 inches ~ 22 lbs sreten.(Basically 3dB efficiency = 1/3 of an octave of bass, or 3dB extra efficiency for the same bass = double the cabinet volume) |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany, Clausthal
|
i canīt see the point why one would make a smaller A7. The A7 is a very large Box good for ~40Hz to < 1000Hz. A smaller one would not bring any bass and be some kind of middle freq. Horn with a higher bass very bad ported enclosure. It would make sense to cut the ported enclosure away, make some kind of mid horn from 200Hz upwards, and use another speaker for bass.
The evolution step from the A7 828 i donīt see in making a smaller one, but in building a larger like the 210! (first i need a larger house) |
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
ie: 1/4 scale or 1" = 4" Quote:
As far as bigger, I already own a pair of the 210 cabinets. You're right, they don't fit in the house. Look in the back of the photo and you'll see the open backs of the A4's You see, this project is an extension of my little aluminum speakers that I wanted to look kind of like the A7. It didn't work and the cabinets are far too small for the woof to develop. I don't need anymore speakers, I have enough. This is just for fun. Thanks for your help so far, Cal |
|||
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
But the effect of the bass front horn can be judged by comparing it to the size of your head, you wont get the controlled projection that is a feature of the A7 design. There is a very good reason why the slot in front of the bass driver is just about perfect for getting your head stuck in it. But I digress : So say 7.5" wide, 6" deep and 13.5" high. (larger if you are not 1/4 thickness ply) Now that isn't that small, especially if you say sod it I want some bass and change the depth to something more sensible. First problem is the tweeter unless you want to go the dreaded piezo route which I presume you don't. Neverless this certainly looks the part you need : http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=280-062 Unless you can find a similar dynamic tweeter. The bass / mid front loading is probably going to cause more problems but neverless you can make the slot a little wider than the scale would indicate and not worry about the lower slope section of the horn in the original. All this means is you could easily use a larger driver than 4". http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=295-301 Seems as good as any, you just need a little care in c/o design. Though you could reuse those ali drivers you have. Due to the much smaller cabinets baffle step can't be ignored. Finally due to 1/4 scale major alterations are needed for the port tuning arrangements, this would also decide the depth of the cabinets. sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||||||||
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks Sreten, your input is always valuable. Cal |
||||||||
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: stockholm
|
Quote:
http://www.aphex.com/204.htm |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FILTER cabinet VOTT ALTEC | sigurd | Multi-Way | 0 | 15th July 2009 11:16 PM |
| What is This cabinet enclosure? Altec? | superjunk | Multi-Way | 0 | 21st April 2009 03:14 PM |
| Recommended Altec 604 Cabinet Designs | jekman | Multi-Way | 8 | 2nd February 2008 02:27 AM |
| Can Altec 515E driver use Onken360 cabinet ? | bananatuan | Multi-Way | 0 | 22nd January 2007 01:32 AM |
| Need to make a new dial scale | Original Burnedfingers | Everything Else | 7 | 30th September 2006 04:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |