|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
i'd like to avoid using an l-pad but would like to tone down the highs my lpg 26t tweeter are producing.
its working in cahoots with an eton 5-880 midrange but its severely outshining it. the eton is rated at 87dB while the lpg is 90dB. both 8ohm units. i've been told using a 4 ohm resistor in series with the lpg may help my cause but i'll need to re-calculate the cap i have limiting anything below 2k reaching the tweeter. i believe its an 11mF cap. what resistor do you think i'll need to tame this tweeter and what new capacitor value should keep it x'ed over at ~2K? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
so long its hard wired with quality resistors.
for approx 3dB drop use 18 ohms across the tweeter, and then 2.2 ohms in series. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
If you change the cap because you add a series resistor, you can calculate the value (based on increased tweeter impedance), but believe me, it will be the same as designing a new crossover.
The parallel resistor as suggested by Andy will bring back the original impedance. Hi Andy, can you recommend 2 or 3 brands of resistor for use with crossovers? What do you think of that gold metal shielded vishay commonly used in tube applications? If Andy thinks that L-PAD has no problem, I guess it is because he never has an inferior amplifiers. IMHO, most problem with speaker is because the amplifier is not up to the task. The L-PAD resistor (or any kind of compensation components) will take away the power (current) out of the drivers, leaving the speaker with inferior sonic quality. But if you cannot avoid the L-pad, what else can you do. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nr London
|
Quote:
There are always options.
__________________
Mark The king of all that is evil has left the building |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
|
Why avoid the L-pad? If your tweeter has higher sensitivity than the woofer, then an L-pad (with fixed resistors) is a very good way to attenuate it. It also helps to keep the load more constant on the XO output.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
Quote:
Sheldon |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Horizontal MTM Center channel: avoiding off-axis nulls | DcibeL | Multi-Way | 27 | 10th October 2009 05:57 PM |
| paralleling capacitors and avoiding resonance | zilog | Power Supplies | 8 | 25th October 2006 12:02 PM |
| Newb Q: Avoiding damage to driver | zafdor | Subwoofers | 13 | 2nd December 2005 11:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08591 seconds (84.57% PHP - 15.43% MySQL) with 10 queries |