|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Hi,
I saw some of the impedance curves of woofers at PE site. None have the irrgularities in impedance curve. So what is Q-balanace all about ( http://www.lithosindia.com/qbalance.htm )? What does it correct? How is it that it corrects more than it alters. I thought the less the components in the crossover the better it is. But Q-balance deliberately introduces components. AVMAX had carried a review of a Lithos' product with Q-Balance and they said it really sounded good. Can somebody throw some more light on the matter. Thanks in advance. Goldy
__________________
Audio enthusiast/hobbyist |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I'm no expert but it sounds like a notch filter except for the "not in the direct signal path of the speaker" part. There's only two ways I know to modify FR and that's electrical or mechanical. If it's not in the signal path (electrical) then it must be mechanical which could include tweaking the cabinet or tweaking the driver. Am I wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Maybe it comes with a small preamp unit which modifies the signal before it hits the power amp.
I understand KEF had a unit something like that once, though not to correct peaks and dips.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
"Q-balance" is nothing but unscientific mumbo - jumbo for some
basic impedance compensation as far as I can tell - hardly new. "not in the signal path" usually means in parallel in these cases. sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
I'd say it's a combination of techniques related to driver selection, driver mounting, crossover design and enclosure design. Some of the more advanced of we DIYers make the same efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The one and only
|
A number of people, mostly manufacturers, attempt to use
the phrase "not in the signal path" to mean "not in series with the signal path", thus they might employ a "Zobel" network in parallel. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
That's the impression I got reading through this too. Many of the "advances" they mention related to their designs are techniques that have been used for a very long time but they try to make it sound new and exclusive.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help me balance SQ and SPL and weight for my sub | eRiCdWoNg | Subwoofers | 6 | 25th February 2007 02:39 AM |
| Where to get balance controls? | Glowbug | Solid State | 5 | 26th October 2006 09:06 AM |
| Readjusting balance | Jasmeleg | Solid State | 3 | 12th September 2005 11:39 AM |
| Balance Pot, (=retro?) | Cobra2 | Everything Else | 2 | 1st December 2003 10:25 AM |
| Are Balance Controls Still Necessary? | runeight | Tubes / Valves | 32 | 2nd November 2003 11:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08987 seconds (75.22% PHP - 24.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |