|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
Hi,
I am trying to design an enclosure for a bipole. With a Jordan JX92s on front and back. about 1 cu foot tuned to 45 Hz in a vented enclosure. Port on front and back. So.. Can I use WinISD for bipoles?? Is a narrow baffle better than a wide one? I kind of want to tailor my baffle using the Edge program to compensate for actual frequency abberations on the driver. What should I do?? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
You don't need seperate ports, use one on the back.
Use the "Edge" to give a smooth response but ignore any indication of BSC required, bipoles don't have BS. Run both drivers full range. Preferably mechanically link the two drivers and have a decoupled mounting arrangement for the assembly. This can be done with rubber grommets in the (drilled out ?) mounting holes and using a flexible sealant or foam around the drivers. One way of doing it is designing depth so the the two drivers can be mechanically linked back to back with "liquid nails". For a ~ 1cuft box I strongly recommend a sealed alignment, though a 45 litre box tuned to 33Hz looks workable if a sub is not being used. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
your responses look a little different than mine in the same program.
Did you use the T/S for the JX92s?? A 1 cu foot box with 2 drivers tuned at 45Hz looks flat in my response. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Your right, the values in WinISD beta are not correct.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TL freq response | bigwill | Subwoofers | 6 | 13th July 2005 07:02 PM |
| amp freq response with o-scope | n0plb | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 2nd June 2005 07:40 PM |
| Overall freq. response *that* bad? | Onvinyl | Analogue Source | 7 | 13th April 2005 06:27 PM |
| Do this amp gives the freq response to 100khz? | diysmartdeep21 | Solid State | 7 | 11th February 2005 08:01 PM |
| how to measure freq response | skyraider | Solid State | 23 | 20th January 2004 07:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09726 seconds (73.59% PHP - 26.41% MySQL) with 11 queries |