|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
Quote:
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Hi,
Can anyone provide me the link to Radio Shack online store. I could not get it from their web site. I would like to order the monopole version of the tweeter (part number 400-1390) Thanks, Goldy
__________________
Audio enthusiast/hobbyist |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
|
"why did it die out?"
1. Poor distribution channel matchup (Radio Shack)? 2. Poor driver choice for bottom end (woofer got lousy reviews)? 3. Heil AMT (fantastic) had very similar problems and fate. 4. Radio Shack used cheap plastic ribbon knock-off from Malaysia -- AuraSound uses silk ribbon 5. It is not dead (see: AuraSound Baby Grand Home Theatre System)
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
|
Linaeum Monopole tweeter: 1.5 AR-52520 204-1
This is the better silk ribbon version and it is $21.00 if they have any. contact: Christine at reception@unical-usa.com |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Hi,
Which one is better Aurasound tweeter or RS tweeter? Thanks, Goldy
__________________
Audio enthusiast/hobbyist |
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
Quote:
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Hi,
How is it that RS unit goes to 25K whereas Aurasound unit goes to 20K and is still considered better. What is the crossover frequency for both? Can users of both please help? Thanks in advance, Goldy
__________________
Audio enthusiast/hobbyist |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
|
Aura is being more realistic and accurate quoting the 20k (no pun intended).
Their silk ribbon is definitely better, as is their quality control. You are more likely to get miss-matched drivers from RS. Crossover at 3k or above (I crossed over at 3.5k) There is a noticeable dip between 2k and 3k. Regards Joe |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
Quote:
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 714
|
I'm interested in the drivers posted in this thread. But can you guys tell me what are the differences between the aura mono and dipole tweeter?
thanks |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Klipsch KG4.5 with Linaeum tweeter | Slothrop | Multi-Way | 2 | 6th May 2010 04:07 PM |
| Linaeum Tweeter - Please Help | johnobuttons | Multi-Way | 21 | 14th December 2008 05:14 AM |
| Linaeum Dipole Tweeter as a Super tweeter? | ktuuri | Planars & Exotics | 5 | 17th June 2008 06:52 PM |
| diy linaeum tweeter | larc99 | Planars & Exotics | 1 | 22nd January 2008 06:54 PM |
| My linaeum tweeter does'nt work | rhkwon | Multi-Way | 0 | 27th October 2004 12:57 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |