|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ontario
|
Qes=1/(ws*Cms*Res) and Cms=Vas/(rho0*c^2 *Sd^2) and Res=(Bl)^2 / Re
Bl=sqrt((rho0*c^2*Sd^2*Re)/(ws*Vas*Qes)) Qes=w0*Mms/((BL)^2/Re)=w0*Mms * Re/(BL)^2 Qts value is determined by Qes=ws*Mms/Res, where Res=(Bl)^2/Re BL = f(Fs, Vas, Qes, Qms, Re, Sd) Formula from the board. I have no idea how to use. Using Unibox Software +Qes = +Qts = -BL +Re = -Spl Can I assume +Mms = +Qes =+Qts =-Bl A change in the voice coil Re does not effect Qts yet really drops Spl = not good. If I raise Qes (driver Re at Fs) the Qts goes up to a very nice .38 = great and SPL drops by 1 db, mostly in the midrange leaving the bass intact. Slight drop in BL. A higher Qts of .38 is an ideal situation for this Pro driver. Can I do this ?? Power Applied 50W Fs 38.2 Re 5.0 Ohm Qms 7.73 Qes 0.32 Sd 858.0 Vas299.0L Xmax 5.5mm SPL at 1 W 1 m 99.1 db SPL at 2.83 Vrms 1m 101.1 db Qts 0.307 Effective Qts 0.307 Mms 60.03g Cms 0.289mm/N Rms 1.864 Kg/s Bl 15.00Tm Ref efficiency, n 5.007% Applied voltage 15.81 Vrms ======================== Now with a change to Qes of .40 SPL at 1 W 1 m 98.1 db SPL at 2.83 Vrms 1m 100.2 db Qts 0.38 Effective Qts 0.38 Mms 60.03g Cms 0.289mm/N Rms 1.864 Kg/s Bl 13.42Tm Ref efficiency, n 4.006% Applied voltage 15.81 Vrms I will be adding Dammer Varnish to the cone area to change the sound and add mass. Is this the trick for a higher Qts higher Qes lower Bl yet leaving the Voice coil Re as is ?? How many grams need to be added for a Qts of 38. I can post a jpg of Parameters or SPL plot, just ask TIA |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
You will not be changing Re by coating the cone. You will be changing Mms, which will affect Qms and Qts.
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
Quote:
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Praha
|
what's happens with Cms and Bl? Stays the same? I Try to calculate added mass for spkr. I have no suitable software for it.
Now: Qms=1,85 Qes= 0,44 Qts=0,36 Mms=65g Cms=330e-6 Fs=35 Bl=13,3 Re=5,6 My resuts for added 45g: Qms=2,61 Qes=0,58 Qts=0,47 Mms=110g Fs=26,4 I assumed the Bl and Cms stays same. Is it true? OTOH I can see small (3%) difference in parametres (could be affected with changing Cms) in table in Dickanson's LDCookbook. Misfortunately the mentioned part is very brief. There is a reference to Tom Nouissiane (probably distorted name- sorry) article in Speaker Builder from 80's which isn't procurable for me. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
CMS and BL are constants.
(Fs/F1)^2=(Mmt+Mass added)/Mmt Qe1 = Qes*(Mmt+Mass added)/Mmt Qm1= Qms *(Mmt+Mass added)/Mmt Vas is constant
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Sorry, brain slip.
CMS and BL are constants. (Fs1/Fs2)^2=(Mmt+Mass added)/Mmt Recalculate Qes and Qms with new Mmt and Fs2. Vas is constant
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Praha
|
Clear. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Praha
|
Btw. I've got advice that paint, with exception of say resin-based thin impegnacy of the cone just for light stiffening, is not so good solution of adding mass because of higher loading or even possible overloading loudspaker's joints. Right solution is to fasten interrupted-ring shaped ballast made of non-magnetic metal directly into the former.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tuning at or below Fs | tech.knockout | Multi-Way | 23 | 3rd February 2012 02:06 PM |
| Tuning a PR? | Animalnisse | Multi-Way | 2 | 11th December 2006 08:31 PM |
| tuning a box too low? | jaygeorge1979 | Subwoofers | 8 | 14th January 2006 10:44 PM |
| Sub Box Tuning | Fazorcat | Subwoofers | 6 | 2nd March 2005 05:30 AM |
| Sub tuning | fortyquid | Subwoofers | 3 | 29th September 2003 07:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |