|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North London
|
I had been of the view that if you stuffed a TL until the lower resonance was completely damped, you'd overstuffed it - the speaker would lose 'life'.
However, someone on the AudioAsylum has posted that the lower resonance can be completely damped as long as the stuffing is not too close to the driver. Apparently, this is also the view of Bud Fried and I can see some sense in it. What has been your experience? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Before Martin's wonderful worksheets arrived I always used my ears to tune the stufffing, and I actually tried this once or twice, and I found it was very driver dependant. With some it worked, with some it didn't. But I must repeat, these were purely subjective, I never actually measured the results. Perhaps a theorist could have a ponder on this for us?
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have to concur. Martin King has done some excellent research into the actual physics of stuffing, and my own TLs are proof, to boot.
Dave |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
I didn't have Martin's worksheets when I built my Ariels. I stuffed them 4 or 5 times without success. The bass sounded very weak. I had been using progressively less stuffing on every attempt. Then I got some response measuring equipment, and it was immediately obvious what the problem was. The bass response was very uneven. What I had interpretted as weak bass was actually a huge suckout. Below the suckout, there was a big peak. I added a lot more stuffing, and things evened out nicely. The bass is now quite acceptable for most program material. However, I am using a Richter Scale Series III to boost the bass some, raising the 45 and 63 Hz sliders, and cutting just a tad at 90 and 125. The bass control on my amp, a Rotel RA-02, is centered too high, at 100 Hz. Turning that up mooshes up male vocals and even some female vocals. (Why don't preamp manufacturers center the bass control around 50Hz, where you usually need it?)
So, you might try just getting the bass as smooth as you can, then using some active EQ if you need it. Works for me.
__________________
Davy Jones |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North London
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
I am unimpressed with the quality of the MathCad program, and with MathCad's support. I bought a legal copy (of course), and registered it, but I couldn't get much help from them, even though I firmly believe the problem is due to a bug in their software. The version I have is now "unsupported", which is software vendor speak for "Up yours. Send us more money for a version that might work."
__________________
Davy Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I'm surprised. I've been using MathCAD Explorer 8 on Win2K Pro at home and at work with no problems.
Hi Steve! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
i had the same problem with mathcad, i'd love to try to mess around with martins tables, but no matter what I try, it wont ever load them, it just "loads them" but stays at the intro screen.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago area
|
Quote:
I couldn't run the worksheets on my Win2K or WinXP machines, both with Norton AV. Going into the AV options screen and turning off the script blocking solved the problem on both machines. BTW this is documented on MJK's website and has been discussed in the Audio Asylum forum. After emailing Martin I found the answer there and within an hour Martin replied with the same info!
__________________
--Sherman |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
I had the NAV issues also, but upgrading to NAV 2004 solved them and now Mathcad V8 and 2k pro work.
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| type of stuffing/damping & mathcad | Henkjan | Full Range | 0 | 9th July 2008 09:24 PM |
| killing op amp osclation | wleediy | Solid State | 6 | 29th January 2008 11:50 AM |
| Damping / Stuffing a Horn | Skitch72 | Full Range | 15 | 28th October 2006 03:57 PM |
| Turning Charlize on softly | neil_kaye | Class D | 7 | 12th March 2006 03:46 PM |
| damping ringing box - more bracing and/or stuffing? | mazurek | Subwoofers | 10 | 9th December 2005 12:56 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12013 seconds (77.55% PHP - 22.45% MySQL) with 10 queries |