Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th April 2004, 02:44 PM   #1
BAM is offline BAM
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Carmel, IN; West Lafayette, IN
Send a message via AIM to BAM
Default Frequency Response: +/-3dB Good Enough?

I have been poking away at a crossover redesign for my main "Project MTM" speakers, and I have reached a point where the predicted response curve according to Speaker Workshop is no more than +/-3dB. Should this be "good enough" for satisfying listening? The Seas H537 tweeter seems to be working pretty good. My problem is with the 5.25" midbass driver I am using. I already have them, and they demonstrate good resolution, and I already have them, so I don't want to go pay for new drivers.

My question is simply this: How important is it to have ruler-flat frequency response, all things considered?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2004, 04:12 PM   #2
MBK is offline MBK  Singapore
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Singapore
If you measure in-room, +- 3 dB is excellent. In anechoic conditions maybe manufacturers would go further, only to achieve +- 5 or even 10 dB in-room

What's more inportant that the fight for the last dB on-axis, is a smooth integration off-axis. Say, repeat the measurements at 45 degrees off axis and see if the drivers integrate smoothly.

Another tidbit: I noticed that dips or peaks of 3 dB in the 100-500 Hz region can change the character quite noticeably, form "boomy" to "lean", it is worth tweaking to find a solution that you like (here it's more "taste" than "engineering").
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2004, 04:23 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
To check the drivers are in phase too reverse the polarity on the tweeter in SPWshop and see if you get a good null at the xover frequency.

Otherwise +-3 is good.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2004, 04:31 PM   #4
BAM is offline BAM
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Carmel, IN; West Lafayette, IN
Send a message via AIM to BAM
Here's a picture of the predicted response. It looks like junk because of that 3200Hz peak but I have already calculated a notch filter to take that one out. Woofer crossover is second order 2100Hz, tweeter crossover is second order 2600Hz. You;ll notice the severely recessed lower midrange and midbass. (This midbass driver is used in the Definitive Technology BP8.) Yet, this is still only -2dB.

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2004, 04:38 PM   #5
MBK is offline MBK  Singapore
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Singapore
Hmm, didn't read carefully. If it's a simulation, I'd stop here, built a prototype (breadboard is enough) and measure in room, this will give a very different picture
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2004, 05:05 PM   #6
BAM is offline BAM
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Carmel, IN; West Lafayette, IN
Send a message via AIM to BAM
I don't have a good measuring setup (or any at all) for actual performance, so I am trying to cover as many bases as possible in my own simulations. The overall character of the speakers shouldn't change much (recessed midrange, good bass, extended and detailed highs), just a major smoothing of the midrange and, of course, the elimination of that bothersome peak.

On a side note, is 2600hz an appropriate crossover point for a tweeter whose Fs is 1200Hz? pdf
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2004, 06:06 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
If you wish to email me the FRD and ZMA files you have for both of these drivers I dont mind having a go with LSPcad and see what I can come up with.

c.storey@freeuk.com
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2004, 09:24 PM   #8
BAM is offline BAM
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Carmel, IN; West Lafayette, IN
Send a message via AIM to BAM
5thelement: YGM.

Thanks, man.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2004, 05:36 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: calcutta
hi

well

i think you will need to divide the drive units to get ruler flat - phase responce

no 1 - phase in tweeters will not be box dependant

no 2 - but lows and mids drivers will be speacially if ported

leaving out off axis performance and polar plots

we have either you go in for manger for a flat frequency responce down to about 80 hz (as its not box dependant)

or considering hi - fi drivers , in ported enclosures of lows to mid lows will have a phase problem speacially when multiple drivers are used - even 2 for sterio purposes - as waves emiited from one will cancel the other - in real life conditions

after box modelling you will need considerable tweeking with the c/o (which will change the timing of the drivers) and porting

with a audio sweep and a pro rta to eliminate phase problems and have the system up / and adapted to your listining area

but once - if you have done this a 1000 USd sytem can take on really expensive set ups - the improvement will be quite a bit

i think the responce is good enough - you should construct the box and then go fro final sound engineering to improve the room for improvement here is quite vast

and more often than not over looked - that way if one uses the most over - killed drive units - and the best box - they should end up with the best loudspeaker

it is not so ,

keen ingeneering , common sence and application can make way for great improvements

suranjan

transducer design engineer
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Frequency response 2litre Analog Line Level 5 31st May 2006 07:00 PM
frequency response pmarcouxx Digital Source 2 20th July 2005 07:43 PM
Is my frequency response bad? SimontY Multi-Way 21 2nd July 2004 08:44 AM
Frequency Response - Is this good ?? mark.carline Multi-Way 26 22nd April 2004 11:18 PM
Doubts on Phase Response and Frequency Response dumrum Multi-Way 11 5th April 2004 10:39 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Page generated in 0.10277 seconds (87.27% PHP - 12.73% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio