|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have been poking away at a crossover redesign for my main "Project MTM" speakers, and I have reached a point where the predicted response curve according to Speaker Workshop is no more than +/-3dB. Should this be "good enough" for satisfying listening? The Seas H537 tweeter seems to be working pretty good. My problem is with the 5.25" midbass driver I am using. I already have them, and they demonstrate good resolution, and I already have them, so I don't want to go pay for new drivers.
My question is simply this: How important is it to have ruler-flat frequency response, all things considered? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Singapore
|
If you measure in-room, +- 3 dB is excellent. In anechoic conditions maybe manufacturers would go further, only to achieve +- 5 or even 10 dB in-room
![]() What's more inportant that the fight for the last dB on-axis, is a smooth integration off-axis. Say, repeat the measurements at 45 degrees off axis and see if the drivers integrate smoothly. Another tidbit: I noticed that dips or peaks of 3 dB in the 100-500 Hz region can change the character quite noticeably, form "boomy" to "lean", it is worth tweaking to find a solution that you like (here it's more "taste" than "engineering"). |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
To check the drivers are in phase too reverse the polarity on the tweeter in SPWshop and see if you get a good null at the xover frequency.
Otherwise +-3 is good.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Here's a picture of the predicted response. It looks like junk because of that 3200Hz peak but I have already calculated a notch filter to take that one out. Woofer crossover is second order 2100Hz, tweeter crossover is second order 2600Hz. You;ll notice the severely recessed lower midrange and midbass. (This midbass driver is used in the Definitive Technology BP8.) Yet, this is still only -2dB.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Singapore
|
Hmm, didn't read carefully. If it's a simulation, I'd stop here, built a prototype (breadboard is enough) and measure in room, this will give a very different picture
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I don't have a good measuring setup (or any at all) for actual performance, so I am trying to cover as many bases as possible in my own simulations. The overall character of the speakers shouldn't change much (recessed midrange, good bass, extended and detailed highs), just a major smoothing of the midrange and, of course, the elimination of that bothersome peak.
On a side note, is 2600hz an appropriate crossover point for a tweeter whose Fs is 1200Hz? pdf |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If you wish to email me the FRD and ZMA files you have for both of these drivers I dont mind having a go with LSPcad and see what I can come up with.
c.storey@freeuk.com
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
5thelement: YGM.
Thanks, man. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: calcutta
|
hi
well i think you will need to divide the drive units to get ruler flat - phase responce no 1 - phase in tweeters will not be box dependant no 2 - but lows and mids drivers will be speacially if ported leaving out off axis performance and polar plots we have either you go in for manger for a flat frequency responce down to about 80 hz (as its not box dependant) or considering hi - fi drivers , in ported enclosures of lows to mid lows will have a phase problem speacially when multiple drivers are used - even 2 for sterio purposes - as waves emiited from one will cancel the other - in real life conditions after box modelling you will need considerable tweeking with the c/o (which will change the timing of the drivers) and porting with a audio sweep and a pro rta to eliminate phase problems and have the system up / and adapted to your listining area but once - if you have done this a 1000 USd sytem can take on really expensive set ups - the improvement will be quite a bit i think the responce is good enough - you should construct the box and then go fro final sound engineering to improve the room for improvement here is quite vast and more often than not over looked - that way if one uses the most over - killed drive units - and the best box - they should end up with the best loudspeaker it is not so , keen ingeneering , common sence and application can make way for great improvements suranjan transducer design engineer |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Frequency response | 2litre | Analog Line Level | 5 | 31st May 2006 07:00 PM |
| frequency response | pmarcouxx | Digital Source | 2 | 20th July 2005 07:43 PM |
| Is my frequency response bad? | SimontY | Multi-Way | 21 | 2nd July 2004 08:44 AM |
| Frequency Response - Is this good ?? | mark.carline | Multi-Way | 26 | 22nd April 2004 11:18 PM |
| Doubts on Phase Response and Frequency Response | dumrum | Multi-Way | 11 | 5th April 2004 10:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10277 seconds (87.27% PHP - 12.73% MySQL) with 10 queries |