|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
What kind of alignment is that? Compared with the vented alignments in the books I've got, the box is way big. Can the next gen from ProAc (D25) be classified as a MLTL?
http://www.audiophile.com.au/proac_specs/d25.html How about the 2.5 with the port in the middle? Here's a quote from the page about the D25: [quote] The original cabinet dimensions have been retained, but there the similarity ends. The cabinets themselves, handcrafted and finished in real wood veneers, are extremely rigid and heavily damped as before, but the introduction of a large flared port beneath the plinths gives better interaction with the listening room, making cabinet placement less critical.
__________________
Davy Jones |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Sealed for the driver = ~ 20 litres.
Reflexed / Vented = ~ 40 litres. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
__________________
Davy Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Another quick calculation indicated external volume is 57 litres. What does your book tell you it should be ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Personally if building it I'd extend depth and go
for the mildly overdamped red line alignment. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
The original question was, what kind of alignment is it? Do you know?
__________________
Davy Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Perth
|
I don't know for sure, but I don't think the D25 is a TL.
I *suspect* it would be a QB3 vented box, albeit with the port facing the floor. A bit like subwoofers with downward facing ports. However the Response 2.5 was a vented box. The internal volume is 34L, with port 75mm (internal diameter) x 140mm long. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
20L sealed and 40L reflexed are from the units T/S parameters. The quick calculations are based on the box sizes. If its as Tktran says 34L and said port, not my kind of bass tuning. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
This is more like it IMO,
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Perth
|
yep one of the ways to extend the bass response of the 2.5 clones is to lengthen the port. gives deeper bass.
the 2.5 and clone has a port configuation that, as sreten correctly points out, gives bass lift from 100Hz to 50Hz, making it sound punchy, and perhaps the illusion of more bass than it really has. - The first time you listen to these speakers you're staring at what seems to be a single 6.5" woofer, playing 8" or 10" levels of bass! You can definitely leave the subwoofer off with this thing! It's hard to say whether it's right or wrong but I look at it as a pro or con- This configuations allows you to keep it clear of the front wall (1 metre minimum) thus minimizing early reflections from ruining clarity and imaging, whilst allowing a "muscular bass" presentation. One of the flat (sretens' last post) or overdamped responses ( sreten's earlier red line alignment) may sound better if you find the bass a bit a little too prominent. I think this may also be of benefit if space or spouse dictates that the speaker must sit against a wall (allows for room gain additive effects). |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Proac Clone | SergeDufour | Multi-Way | 0 | 22nd November 2006 09:08 PM |
| Proac Clone Q's | elilindner | Multi-Way | 0 | 3rd December 2003 02:19 AM |
| Question regarding ProAc 2.5 Clone and Tempo 2 Clone | zoooh | Multi-Way | 5 | 11th March 2003 08:19 PM |
| Proac 2.5 clone volume question | supernet | Multi-Way | 4 | 16th December 2002 03:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12574 seconds (79.60% PHP - 20.40% MySQL) with 11 queries |