|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Aalesund
|
Hi
I'm aboute to put my Beyma AG8/N into an open baffle which measures: 110cm * 60cm. I'v tried to understand the golden ratio for placing the center of the driver in the baffle. Please correct me if I am wrong: From side: 60 / 1.618 = 37cm From bottom 110 / 1.618 = 68cm From top 110-68 = 42cm Am I way off ? Bjorn |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
From what I can tell not at all.
However in the art of compromise something sometimes has to give. When placing a tweeter you'd only use the baffle width ignoring the hieght. And use ratios of ~ 0.6 : 1 : 1.6 for distance to top a sides. However in the open baffle the short distance would compromise rolloff frequency some what. In a 2 way open baffle the higher unit would be placed like the tweeter. The bass unit would be placed (asumming the baffle is floorstanding) as though the baffle is double the hieght due to floor symmetry. For a single full range unit ideally you treat it as a cross between the two. I'll just point out that 42 cm is too similar to 37cm to be ideal. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
You may also use the ratio of .8 : 1 : 1.25
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Aalesund
|
Ok, but i don't see the measures and the calculation. Can you give me an example for the baffle i mentioned?
bjørn |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
no problem :
using 0.8 : 1 : 1.25 and baffle width = 60cm 1) centre distance from side 1 = 27cm centre distance from side 2 = 33cm centre distance from top = 42cm or : 2) centre distance from side 1 = 23.5cm centre distance from side 2 = 36.5cm centre distance from top = 29cm or : 3) centre distance from side 1 = 27cm centre distance from side 2 = 33cm centre distance from top = 21cm I'd say its between 2 & 3 decide on ear hieght. The first is good for bass with an angled baffle. Note that 1&3 are the same except one dimension is doubled. (cube root of 2 = 1.26, its inverse = 0.79) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| √½ instead of the golden ratio | Key | Multi-Way | 19 | 18th March 2009 09:36 AM |
| The Golden Ratio Stage | Stee | Solid State | 7 | 22nd February 2009 08:46 PM |
| Golden Ratio Height | edjosh23 | Full Range | 13 | 3rd February 2009 09:52 PM |
| W4-1320SB Golden Ratio BR | sharpi31 | Full Range | 4 | 8th December 2005 09:50 PM |
| Golden Box Ratio - Important or not? | Ornlu | Subwoofers | 5 | 27th May 2005 06:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.23377 seconds (88.79% PHP - 11.21% MySQL) with 10 queries |