silk purse from sows ear contest?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I have never thought of this before, but almost seriously starting to consider Faital 8FE200 together with Visaton FRS 5 X.

This is very difficult!
 

Attachments

  • Considering.jpg
    Considering.jpg
    140.4 KB · Views: 204
Re MCM qts: no surprise on that, though a little more ferrite in the motor shouldn't cost so much. I've never bought anything there, since back in the day my customers put up the bucks for the audax/seas/scanspeak drivers I was playing with, and I got spoiled. Most of the lesser (cheaper) stuff arrived with fs about 50% higher than stated in their specs.
The little Visaton is interesting and affordable. I no longer have patrons funding scanspeak purchases.
 
Last edited:
The QTs on MCM drivers rarely comes out as stated. Just FYI.

-those measured with Clio shouldn't be that far off (assuming a similar "run-in" before measurement), UNLESS the manufacturing is off.

-the problem with manufacturing being off on such a cheap driver is returning it, it would cost to much shipping to get a replacement. :eek:

-sort of an expected silk purse and a resulting sow's ear situation. :p



Note: some of those small "fullrange" Peerless drivers are better than Visaton (in linearity and non-linearity).
 
You boys had better get on the stick...

Here's another Grand Appalachian Design that works rather well..

A couple Dollar Tree buys, A battery box with a switch, 3.5mm stereo chassis jack, Bluetooth receiver (Cable included), Cardboard box, 3"x5" GRS car speaker, Sheet of foam board, Tube of silicone sealer, And, of course, A dab of spray truck bed liner..

i4RxyS.jpg


https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q90/924/3UwDqg.jpg

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q90/923/cuKPMM.jpg

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q90/924/mx7pNV.jpg
 
Just another Moderator
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Thought I'd post what I've done so far. Not giving away the exact drivers, but it is a peerless and a visaton. As I said my entry will be a non-qualifying simulation only. Total driver cost is a tad under $22 US leaving me with $8 for crossover components, which I haven't checked on the cost yet but should hopefully be doable.

I think off axis would probably be a bit ordinary, and power handling pretty low, but within the constraints I think coming along ok. Note That this sim fully accounts for the baffle as well.

Tony.
 

Attachments

  • comp_sim.png
    comp_sim.png
    21 KB · Views: 181
Last edited:
Just another Moderator
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Different schools of thought around this. One is to have flat on axis (anechoically) and use EQ to make a room curve for the specific room.

Another is to bake it into the crossover, though that is more appropriate for a particular room and may be too much or too little depending on the room the speaker is used in.

I put a slight down slope in the one I posted above, but I have in the past gone for flat on axis. The other thing that can happen (which would be exacerbated by down slope from 20 hz to 20Khz) is that due to room modes and speaker placement related room gain, you may end up with too much bass.

Tony.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.