@Navyblue
The thread you started may have invoked emotion at times, but it has also attracted a fair number of posts and views.
Each member who has contributed has done so in their own inimitable fashion and I, for one, have enjoyed doing so.
It would be a dull world if we all agreed on everything and I perceive that overall the thread has been a success!
The thread you started may have invoked emotion at times, but it has also attracted a fair number of posts and views.
Each member who has contributed has done so in their own inimitable fashion and I, for one, have enjoyed doing so.
It would be a dull world if we all agreed on everything and I perceive that overall the thread has been a success!
@Nb
Do you want to hear that the higher range is more sensitive to errors.. that the amount of error in response needs to be less, that diffraction is more noticeable, that the dimensions are smaller and hence easier to mess up? As this is not exactly the tweeter but more the implementation, and given that the entire spectrum needs to be right in the end, maybe this is a matter of finding the right question?
Do you want to hear that the higher range is more sensitive to errors.. that the amount of error in response needs to be less, that diffraction is more noticeable, that the dimensions are smaller and hence easier to mess up? As this is not exactly the tweeter but more the implementation, and given that the entire spectrum needs to be right in the end, maybe this is a matter of finding the right question?
Might you have a suggested reference to this? I assume amplifier crossover distortion, noise floor and undue resonance in any part of the system to be of interest, but it would be interesting to read of another's journey.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.