BSC, how well does 115/W perform
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 5th April 2004, 07:00 PM #1 Svante   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Stockholm BSC, how well does 115/W perform Hi, Surfing around on the web the formula f3 = 115 / (baffle width in metres) often appears. When I run my own program The Edge it appears as if this yields a much too high frequency. In the image below, a typical floorstander is simulated with a baffle width of 0.2 m, which should give an f3 of 575 Hz. Assuming full compensation, the two frequencies to enter in The Edge would be 406 and 812 Hz. This is the green curve. If I let The Edge calculate the values, I end up with 151 and 302 Hz. This is the red curve, and this compensation is shown in blue. What I really am interested in is hearing from you all about practical experiences with the equation above, does it compensate the baffle step well, or do you still see effects like the green curve after applying it? __________________ Simulate loudspeakers: Basta! Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
tiroth
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
This simulation is identical to yours except the baffle is square. You can see that the "rule of thumb" is very close to the Edge's suggested result.

Obviously the 115/w does not take baffle height into account at all. I would *think* that your method would be more accurate...I wish I could supply the needed empirical data.

Unfortunately not many people have the equipment to be able to measure 1-2dB ripples in the response.
Attached Images
 edge.gif (17.4 KB, 144 views)

Zozo
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hungary
Well, I have made some measurements, but not with the exact value The Edge suggests. The baffle size is 220x1000mm and I have used two coils for the test :
The first value was 1,5mH which is close to Olson's formula : L=Wb*R/1.021 which gives ~1,8mH.
The second value is 2,7mH which is far from the 4.2mH The Edge calculates with 150Hz(f1) and 300Hz(f2), but showing the direction where the compensation goes. This is like I have used 230/460Hz for the compensation points.

I start to believe that your calculations are correct , however with the bigger value the sound is thinner (?), instruments and human voice lacks some body.

First here is the measurement.
Orange line=raw driver in box, Blue=1,5mH||8ohm, Green=2,7mH||8ohm
Attached Images
 bstep2.jpg (64.4 KB, 132 views)

Zozo
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hungary
and here is what The Edge predicted with the two values.
Red curve=1.5mH, green curve=2,7mH.
As per the simulation I should have a big hump at 600-700Hz, which doesn't exist in the measurement.

Zozo
Attached Images
 edge.jpg (78.2 KB, 126 views)

 5th April 2004, 08:49 PM #5 Svante   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Stockholm This is exactly the kind of data I was looking for. It is hard to say which one of the green and blue that would be the best, but it definitely appears as if 4.2 mH would be too much. To the defence of The Edge one could say that the resistance of the loudspeaker probably isn't 8 ohms, but rather 6 ohms, and this would give an L of 3,1 mH which still appears a bit high. Thanks! __________________ Simulate loudspeakers: Basta! Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
 5th April 2004, 08:54 PM #6 Svante   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Stockholm Well, the hump is not *that* big, only + 2-4 dB, and with a bit of good will, it can *maybe* be seen there. But I agree that it is far from crystal clear, there seems to be a lot more going on in this speaker. Might I ask, how was this measurement performed? It does not look lika a MLS measurement. __________________ Simulate loudspeakers: Basta! Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
 5th April 2004, 09:29 PM #7 Zozo diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Hungary Yes, it's an MLS measurement from around 1 meter and I had to apply a 1/2 octave smooting to it to be hmmm.. more readable. Well, you are right, there is a small hump at 6-700Hz, but there is a bigger one one octave bellow which annoys me a bit, because it seems hard to get rid of it. Also, if I would do the same test from 2 meters I would get a different result. My feeling is that BSC probably requires a more complex compensating network.
 5th April 2004, 09:56 PM #8 Svante   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Stockholm Yes, BSC in its simplest form assumes a spherical cabinet. From what I have seen in The Edge it appears as if most flat baffle shapes have a reasonably large hump added to this at about the upper of the two step frequencies. This could probably be compensated for with a better network. However, given the dimensions you have on your baffle, I don't think that the hump at 200-400 Hz is caused by the BS. Could you provide more detail on what driver you use. That is, if you want me to say anything about it. Could it be that the hump is actually two dips at 170 and 500 Hz? That would fit with the 1st and 3rd resonance along the 1000 mm of the box. I don't know why the second mode would not be excited, but that could be due to the driver placement. Do you have stuffing inside the box? __________________ Simulate loudspeakers: Basta! Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
 6th April 2004, 02:24 PM #9 Zozo diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Hungary This is actually a Proac clone and I experimenting with the baffle step, because I think that a single 1,5 or 1,8mH inductor doesn't coop well with the issue. The woofer center is located around 750mm from the floor and the box is dampened. You are right about the 300Hz hump. I have looked at the measurements I have made and it's "moving" between 200-400Hz depending on the measuring distance, so it's probably a room reflection, but only a single hump. Zozo
 6th April 2004, 02:39 PM #10 Svante   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Stockholm Hmm, interesting. Placing the driver at 750 mm would not excite the second mode! A funny experiment would be to put the microphone inside the box and see if you have resonances at 170 and 500 Hz. If it is a BR (I am not familiar with the Proac) the mic can easily be inserted through the vent. Put the mic at the floor inside the box top see all resonances. If you have resonances, it might be that you need more stuffing. As you say, the fact that the hump is moving talks against this theory, but in the hunt of the cause, another measurement could IMO do no harm... :-) __________________ Simulate loudspeakers: Basta! Simulate the baffle step: The Edge

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post BHTX Planars & Exotics 0 31st October 2007 02:42 AM hemanth Multi-Way 2 7th September 2005 03:52 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:21 PM.