You could even consider it's a "joke". But as a four port, it does take into account the infinity. Yes, I purposely use overly fancy language. I learned from the bs ... err I mean the best.
BS would be a reasonable summary, given that your drawing is illegible and you refuse to say anything whatsoever about it.
Just so everyone else is clear, you're not going to provide a single equation or piece of documented, peer-reviewed and accepted evidence to support your nebulous contentions? I think that tells everybody all they need to know.
Just so everyone else is clear, you're not going to provide a single equation or piece of documented, peer-reviewed and accepted evidence to support your nebulous contentions? I think that tells everybody all they need to know.
Last edited:
Evidently not Andy, but then, you appear to be the only person here who believes this is some kind of competition. Nobody else does as far as I can see. We're all just eagerly waiting for you to prove your assertions, which, alas! requires more than an illegible line drawing on a scrap piece of paper which you refuse to say anything about. I've repeatedly asked you to provide your peer-reviewed evidence and equations, but they remain conspicuous by their absence. So in the interest of those who may not be up on the subject, and liable to being (inadvertently, I'm sure) mislead, I repeat my previous comment:
Get on with it.
Get on with it.
Last edited:
This is RF theory. It is valid, and I always use it when building amps. I consider parasitic reactances, circuit loops and parasitic coupling, and HF resonances. Then.. I terminate the amp to RF and lead out to the speaker. The speaker circuit is high level, low impedance and has no gain, so I don't pursue RF theory there.
Translation? PleaseWhat's a "coffee table brochure"?
A glossy product catalog with pretty pictures.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.