
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Blogs  Gallery  Wiki  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
MultiWay Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers 
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
18th November 2017, 03:07 AM  #11 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, TX

POST #3
A. Point Source: frequencydomain pressure response (continued) Our little point source has what i've called a frequencydomain transfer function : H(w) = [(rho)/(4pi*r)]*exp[jwTd] or, alternately, H(k) = [(rho)/(4pi*r)]*exp[jkr] where: r = distance from point source c = speed of sound w = radian frequency = 2pi*f Td = time delay = r/c k = wavenumber = w/c In a nutshell, H(w) tells us what the pressure will be at any distance "r" from the point source, given a point source excitation at frequency "w". Let's dig a little deeper ... In engineering parlance, socalled "transfer functions" are written as : H(w) = mag(w)*exp[j*phase(w)] Transfer functions are complex functions of frequency (w), which simply means that they are functions of frequency with both magnitude and phase (or, real part and imaginary part) components. If the input signal is a sinewave, the output signal will also be a sinewave ... at the same frequency (w) ... but with a different magnitude and a different phase, as "modified" by the system's transfer function. We can compare this general formulation of a transfer function to our point source transfer function, to reveal, for a point source : mag(w) = rho/(4pi*r) phase(w) = w*Td From which we conclude : The magnitude response of the pointsource transfer function (radiating into 4pi space) is FLAT, independent of frequency. BUT, it does drop at a rate of 1/r = 6dB for every doubling of distance. The phase response of the pointsource transfer function (radiating into 4pi space) is linear, corresponding to a pure time delay = Td. At this point, we can also introduce another property of transfer functions called "group delay", which is the negative of the first derivative of phase wrt frequency. For our little point source, the group delay associated with our transfer function is simply Td. Editorial : I think it may be a bit uncommon to describe radiation patterns of point sources and line sources (or any sources) as radiating elements with spatial (and, of course, frequencydependent) "transfer functions". But that's because i'm an electrical engineer, rather than a physicist and it's supportive of our ultimate goal, which is to develop and compare both frequency domain and time domain responses for these sources. Summary: The magnitude response of the point source transfer function is wonderfully "flat" with frequency ... meaning that ALL frequencies will be measured (pressure) with equal amplitude (at the same point in space). The magnitude of ALL frequencies will, however, drop at a rate of 6dB for every doubling of distance from the source. The phase response of point source transfer functions is linear, representing a simple time delay = Td. next up : the timedomain impulse response of the point source transfer function. 
18th November 2017, 03:37 AM  #12 
diyAudio Member

having a seat this thread and thanks language werewolf explaining into details in logic way, all the math is mystery to me but can relate stuff to own diy speaker work using Rephase and REW to help make complicated overviews and corrections to systems.

18th November 2017, 12:29 PM  #13  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006

Superb from every aspect....Thanks.
Quote:
Loving all of this big time. Cheers Derek.
__________________
" This is not the end, not even the beginning of the end, but it is the end of the beginning " Sir Winston Churchill 1943 

18th November 2017, 03:22 PM  #14 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Vienna Austria

Is there one more seat vacant?

18th November 2017, 04:47 PM  #15 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Wake Forest, NC

*Subscribed*

18th November 2017, 05:44 PM  #16 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.

Ditto!
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. 
18th November 2017, 06:46 PM  #17  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan

Quote:
In physics what you are describing is what we call the Green's function it is similar to a EE impulse response except that it is multidimension in spacetime i.e. 4 dimensions (nonrelativistic of course). The Green's function relates the pressure at any point in space due to a source at another point in space. The part that you are missing above is the source strength which is normally given in terms of the volume velocity. For a Green's function that relates a volume velocity to a pressure the response to a frequency independent volume velocity would go as omega, i.e. it would rise as the frequency goes up at +6 dB/oct. A speaker is basically flat because its volume velocity is falling (above resonance) at exactly the same rate of 6 dB/oct, hence a net flat response. The subject of line arrays is covered in my book in Chapter 9 of my book, which is free at my web site. One reviewer said about the book that if you thought that you understood line arrays then you needed to read this chapter.
__________________
Earl Geddes Gedlee Website 

18th November 2017, 08:05 PM  #18 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, TX

Thank you, good sir!
In my analysis ... yes, engineering vs physics ... I associate the strength of the source with the source itself, rather than with the socalled "transfer function". In Post #2, I've called the strength of the source "Ao", and identified it as a constant volume acceleration, rather than a constant volume velocity. In this scenario, the measured pressure will drop at 6dB for every doubling of distance from the point source, but the measured pressure at any point in space will be flat (constant) with frequency. Last edited by werewolf; 18th November 2017 at 08:08 PM. 
18th November 2017, 08:17 PM  #19 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, TX

Thanks for the encouragement! It's a bit challenging sometimes, to offer mathematicallyoriented tutorials on message boards ... but it's well worth it, if we all (including yours truly!) learn something

18th November 2017, 08:20 PM  #20  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan

Quote:
__________________
Earl Geddes Gedlee Website 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Short Line Array (line source) build  perceval  Full Range  226  4th January 2015 03:08 PM 
Achieving Optimum Line Array Performance Through Predictive Analysis  Patrick Bateman  MultiWay  2  27th June 2014 12:45 PM 
Shunyata DTCD power line analysis  jackinnj  Power Supplies  1  16th December 2011 01:30 AM 
Dynamic load line analysis using music and speaker load  Michael Koster  Tubes / Valves  0  7th March 2008 09:47 PM 
line source diffraction  david yost  MultiWay  8  5th June 2005 03:01 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 