|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norway
|
Apardon the stupid title of this thread, I really didn't know what to call it. I am onto a project designing speakers using Accuton drivers, and these drivers have an extremely thin membrane, thus very vulnerable to back-waves from inside the cabinet.
The perhaps very best speakers utilizing these drivers may be Kharma, so I did some research on their approach to acoustic damping of the box. I found that Kharma used the method pictured below, but I wonder.. Will this "hardware" damping be enough in itself, or should i dress it in bitumen/acustilux as an addition?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
No direct reflected waves but also no absorbtion. I would add some absorbing material.
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brisbane, QLD
|
The effects of having irregular surfaces are different depending on the frequency of sounds reflecting from those surfaces. That is what most people seem to forget. A 1kHz tone has a wavelength of around 340mm, so relatively small 30mm irregularities won't be much different from a completely smooth wall at that frequency.
I think what makes Accuton speakers more susceptible to reflected sounds is because they're unmasked by a conspicuous lack of cone resonances. Furthermore, because the cone moves as a solid piston through a wider range of frequencies, box resonances move the *whole* cone to produce identical directivity characteristics as the sound that the speaker is supposed to be making. I don't think that the thinness of the cone has that much to do with reflected sounds passing through it, rather it depends on the T/S parameters, specifically: Qes (electrical damping). A high Qes means that the amplifier can't control the cone very effectively. Having a passive crossover may make it significantly worse, because the speakers are decoupled from the amplifier with reactive components. CM |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norway
|
Quote:
So you are saying I probably will have just as good results by a conventional box and lead&bitumen damping? Area of operation for the Accuton driver will be between 30Hz and 3000Hz.. You know these drivers; what damping would you recommend? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norway
|
I should add that we are talking ported enclosure...
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Plate Amp power cutout | 3KFX | Solid State | 11 | 10th March 2007 07:03 PM |
| two BIB questions re inner baffle and driver cutout | drec | Full Range | 3 | 23rd December 2006 02:59 AM |
| Lenco plinth cutout plans? | fishwinker | Analogue Source | 5 | 3rd September 2006 02:11 PM |
| Power supply cutout | argonrepublic | Everything Else | 0 | 15th March 2006 06:09 PM |
| Help installing driver when cutout wrong size | morbo | Multi-Way | 19 | 9th February 2005 02:43 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09447 seconds (75.84% PHP - 24.16% MySQL) with 10 queries |