|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Holland
|
I understand removing the ferrofluid from my tweeters will improve sound quality. Will the response be tilted up when doing this?( more high frequency). Or just more resolution all over.
Damping will be reduced, how will this sound? Any way to compensate for this mechanicly? I have already used some "puzzlecoat" They are fairly sensitive (97 db with horn) 1" non compression dome horn drivers. I dont know if this is relevant for the results. I dont have any spare ferrofluid so trying it is non reversable until i can get a hold of some. I also dont know what the viscosity is. Coolin |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brisbane, QLD
|
Change the response? Definitely. Improve it? I doubt that very much.
Since ferrofluid is part of the magnet system of the speaker, removing some of it will weaken the effective strength of the magnet. This would probably cause a peak in the midrange, a drop in efficiency at high frequencies, and a dramatic increase of possible resonances. The whole point of ferrofluid is for damping of resonances and to be able to use a smaller magnet than otherwise possible. If the manufacturer could save money and make the tweeter sound better by not adding ferrofluid, then they would've already thought of that. CM |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
Some Scandinavian tweeters are deliberately marketed as having no ferrofluid (e.g. Seas No-Ferro) and they are said to sound BETTER than their ferrofluid counterparts. But changeing a driver's properties by removing the ferrofluid might give somewhat unpredictable results (it is designed with the ferrofluid taken into account after all). The best would be to find out if someone has already done it on the very same model and what the outcome was. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Holland
|
I know that the theory would seem it would be a bad idea but there are experienced people that have tried it and said it was an improvement.
With regards to the magnetic strength issue, Jon Risch has said it has very little effect. I can imagine you loose detail because of the friction in the fluid. There are many post over at AA regarding this issue but only a few who have tried and recomend it. Im looking for more who have done this here. Also i have read somewhere that some Scan speak top models dont use it iether......... Later, Coolin |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norway
|
I know the people at Kharma does the removal of the ferrofluid themselves, manually, on Focal tioxid tweeters. I think it would be very hard to predict how the response is affected, but one approach could be to buy an extra tweeter to experiment with.
I also think it would be very much harder to do on a soft dome tweeter than on a ceramic or metal dome tweeter. Remove the membrane from the test-tweeter , and use some very accurate pipettes (from medical use or something) to remove some ferrofluid. Reassemble and measure. Write carefully down your results, both measurements and ammount of removed ferrofluid, and repeat the process. Remove some more fluids.. measure.. write down.. on and on.. ![]() You should maybe keep a small ammount of the ferrofluid left in the tweeter , I'm really not the one to tell you how much. Experiment if you can afford it. When and if you can keep a smooth response with a minimal ammount of ferrofluid left or nothing at all, go for a modification of both tweeters you will use in your speakers, and remove exactly the same ammount of ferrofluid from both... Note that even if you make it work with an improved result, the ferrofluid do have a purpose in a tweeter designed to be ferrofluidfilled. There will be no warranty if you burn your tweeters, so if you're to experiment, make sure you can afford some blown tweeters... An approach could also be to buy some tweeters with no ferro-fluid (like the top models from Scan-Speak in denmark) |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Ferrofluid provides mechanical dampening and dramatically reduces Qms [and thus Qts] of the driver and flattens its impedance curve in the Fs zone
If the ferrofluid is removed, then most T/S parameters of the tweeter would change. Qms will be higher and the driver may tend to peak near Fs before rollof ['honky' sound], even Fs may change. The crossover would also need to be redesigned since impedance curve will have different shape and a big resonance peak A tweeter designed to rely hardly on ferrofluid dampening may be unusable after ferrofluid is removed |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brisbane, QLD
|
When and where was it established that removing ferrofluid would be a good idea in the first place? Just because some highly regarded tweeters are designed without any ferrofluid, surely it doesn't mean that other tweeters should have their's removed?
CM |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norway
|
Quote:
As said, regarding the focal tioxid tweeters, Kharma personel does this to great success. The Equisite series and the Ceramique 3.2 RFM, perhaps the very best 2-way system ever built by man, uses these manually modified tweeters... but wether it's a good idea or not to attempt this as a DIYer is an entirely different matter. I am sure the people at Kharma have high expertise and the funds and equipment to do this in a proper manner, but my point being that there can, in some cases, be beneficial to remove the fluids if one knows what to do and how to do it (wich, neither of us really do i guess..) However, I would still say there's a 99% chance at least to get a better result by buying a tweeter that meet ones goals, than by modifying one that doesn't... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm resurrecting this thread to ask if there are any more current comments or experiences. In particular, I'm wondering what to expect from my Vifa D27TG35 tweeters if I were to remove the ferrofluid from them.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: usa
|
Troels removed the fluid on a Monacor tweet.. with some interesting results.
http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/C17_II.htm He documents the results near the beginning of the article. Photos of hte process at the end. Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where to buy ferrofluid ? | thylantyr | Multi-Way | 9 | 10th May 2005 07:42 AM |
| Do not understand ferrofluid. | tade | Everything Else | 10 | 5th May 2005 01:27 AM |
| Ferrofluid & power handling | David Gatti | Multi-Way | 8 | 18th April 2005 03:02 AM |
| Ferrofluid and its Effect on Distortions? | brummkreisel | Multi-Way | 3 | 24th July 2004 09:42 PM |
| Ferrofluid tweeter misshap! | Tino | Multi-Way | 3 | 10th January 2004 06:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12577 seconds (81.30% PHP - 18.70% MySQL) with 10 queries |