Speaker enclosure damping

With regard to determining the need to dampen structure borne vibration (cabinets), what about 'bumping' the cabinet panels and listening for ringing? The exciter can be a mallet. There is some technique to this as the softness of the mallet head and the firmness of the blow may need to be tailored to excite the panels at appropriate frequencies. As for listening, I would think a calibrated mic and something that dynamically displays the emitted frequency spectrum would be useful. Doing things like placing a hand on the panel or adding effective damping material should produce observable changes in the ringing.

Thoughts?
 
Just to sum up, if you want to increase effective box volume, then filling with almost anything will add up to 20%, converting low frequency compression/expansion from adiabatic to isothermal (look those terms up).

To suppress internal acoustic energy at middle frequencies, use dense material on the internal walls and less dense towards the middle of the enclosure - and use something that actually works.

To reduce enclosure wall vibration, just make it very rigid (using bracing as necessary) and heavy. You can use constrained layer damping in larger boxes if they're thin-walled, but there'll still be significant output at low frequencies.
I was wondering then, i have read the specs on a SS driver that recommends a 65 litre sealed enclosure so if you are going to stuff the box would you then use a box that is 15/20% less in volume so that you reach the recommended 65 litre volume once dampened? I hope that makes sense. So around 50 litre?
 
Numerous Simulators will show the effects of absorption

Of the many Q or Quality Factors in TS parameters

Qa = is for Absorption

Most simulators should include Qa

Felt lining or Poly fiber is used to reduce
reflections inside the box which can bounce
back to the speaker cone and cause frequency response peaks.

The Q measurements (Quality Factors) relate to the amount of relative damping in a loudspeaker.
They describe how well the driver can control its movement at the resonant frequency.

Q is the inverse of the damping ratio, and so lower Q values mean more control.

So a light lining of a vented box would have actual very
minimum effect of a speaker Q
Its mainly to reduce reflections

If a enclosure is overstuffed with absorption material
it then can have a effect on the damping or the driver.
Just like any other Quality factor

With a typical Vented box
Your just lining the cabinet to reduce reflections
and improve midrange response.

You would really have to heavily stuff a box
to start showing actual negative effects.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi All

I have build this closed sub-woofer and want to now what is best damping? I did use polyester filling.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN3780.JPG
    DSCN3780.JPG
    211.9 KB · Views: 61
  • DSCN3774.JPG
    DSCN3774.JPG
    236.6 KB · Views: 56
  • DSCN4751[1].JPG
    DSCN4751[1].JPG
    328 KB · Views: 56
Am I right in thinking this?
With a sub, the panel resonances would be above any frequency that the speaker will reproduce, so no damping required
Also, the path lengths inside the cabinet are shorter than any wavelength the speaker will produce, so no filling required

Brian
 
For a sub, i don't stuff them........

There are tests showing a lowering of qtc by stuffing (sealed sub)........
I have a sealed sub, so that is why I do ask about damping, this if for lowering qts also, I use a shelf filter for correcting until 20 hz. I have never try the
sub without damping, but have put more in past week as a result it looks now to have much less bass, I use the sub until 100Hz, but because the other two boxes can go to 50 hz low end I did thought about lowering that. I can try course what it does without damping. By the way the two Magnat speaker with bass reflex has also no damping whatsoever, I did also put a layer in, that did result in a lot more open and deeper sound.

I go take the measurement system out of the closed and go measuring the sub to see what happens.
 
For subs, the box dimensions will usually be much smaller than the wavelengths of interest - but don't forget harmonic distortion products, which may excite resonances higher than the crossover frequency.

Polyester is pretty useless as an absorptive stuffing material (fibreglass loft insulation is pretty much the best - but nasty), but will work as well as any alternative for gaining that extra ~20% of effective cabinet volume. Mainly for sealed boxes though, as bass reflex designs may not be particularly tolerant of excessive stuffing.