Relating SPL to Force? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th March 2004, 11:12 AM   #1
Kaoss is offline Kaoss  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bristol
Default Relating SPL to Force?

I'm currently doing some work on optimising speakers for use with class-d amplifiers. So far, I've got the power down to about 0.2W for an 80dB SPL at 50cm. Now I'm looking for an equation to relate the force on the coil (and thus acceleration) to the SPL output, in order to predict the effect of increased gap field on the SPL output. Can anyone help?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2004, 03:42 PM   #2
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
I would suggest you get:
"Acoustics" by L.L. Beranek
or
"Theory and Design of Loudspeaker Enclosures" by J.E. Benson
or
JAES articles from Thiele or Small in the early 1970's

Force on the coil is B*l*i
B= Gap field strength
l = length of wire perpendicular to B
i = VC current

Trouble is, current is affected by cone motion, (Motional impedance - Lenz's Law)
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2004, 04:12 PM   #3
Svante is offline Svante  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Svante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
-Sound pressure is proportional to cone acceleration, assuming that the cone moves like a rigid piston, and that it is small compared to wavelength.
-Cone *velocity*, ie time integral of acceleration, is proportional to the force divided by the mechanical impedance.
-Mechanical impedance is jw*Mms+Rms+1/(jwCms), or simply jw*Mms (a bit) above fs.
-Force is proportional to I*B*L, where I is the current, B is the magnetic flux density, and L is the length of the voice coil wire in that magnetic field.
-Current is proportional to voltage divided by electrical impedance.
-Electrical impedance is Re+jw*Le+((1/(jw*Mms/(BL)^2)) // (jw*(BL)^2*Cms) // ((BL)^2/Rms)) ("a//b" means a and b in parallel, or ab/(a+b)=1/(1/a+1/b)).

The above holds for a driver mounted in an infinite baffle, or a cloesed box, if Cms is taken to include box stiffness and Rms includes box losses.

I hope I got it right.
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2008, 01:19 AM   #4
MCPete is offline MCPete  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default SPL ~ F^2

From the FAQ section of www.linkwitzlab.com, the 3rd paragraph of A21, I infer that velocity of a piston is proportional to current througn a voice coil driving the piston:

Vp ~ I

Driving force of the coil F is proportional to I (as posted above by Ron E and Svante):

F ~ I

Thus

Vp ~ F

Linkwitz in his A21 states that acoustic power Ap is proportional to piston velocity squared:

Pa ~ (Vp)^2

Thus

Pa ~ F^2

Assuming that SPL is proportional to Pa, then

SPL ~ F^2

I think the above implies the following interesting result. As frequency drops from two to three times the resonant frequency of a driver to the resonant frequency, electrical power to the driver decreases at the inverse of the ratio of increased impedance, while the driving force decreases to the square of the inverse of that ratio. (This assumes that the driving amplifier is a voltage source.)

Regards,
Pete
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2008, 05:17 AM   #5
MCPete is offline MCPete  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default correction to my post #4

At the bottom, instead of driving force F, I meant to say that acoustic power Pa decreases to the square of the inverse of increased impedance. That is, the counterintuitive result seems to be that if impedance at the resonant frequency Fc is three times impedance at two to three times Fc, then electrical power is reduced by one-third while acoustic power is reduced by one-ninth.

-Pete
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Equation relating t/s parameters to sensitivity vs frequency thadman Multi-Way 7 22nd November 2008 08:44 PM
Relating mic sensitivity to output voltage veracohr Analogue Source 2 29th February 2008 05:24 PM
Beyond the Force? moray james Class D 10 19th January 2006 10:00 PM
Question(s) relating to monitor loudspeakers ERICSPEEd Multi-Way 0 30th May 2005 04:48 AM
Help on Brute force Ryssen Tubes / Valves 5 2nd May 2004 11:07 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:26 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2