|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
The terms were Woofer, Squawker, Tweeter, american I believe.
I believe Sqawker fell into non-use because its simply not as good a name for the relevant unit as the other two. Though it is pretty apt for the "midrange" in many a cheap speaker, which in reality are usually overgrown tweeters. Considering this perhaps its also because it has derogatory connotations that advertising copywriters stopped using it. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
It could also be related to another tele-comm term "squawk box" referring to early telephones, intercoms, primarily voice transmission and descriptive of the distortion that was common with such devices.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
|
I aggree with Timn8ter as to the use of that term. I never heard it used in reference to speakers used for music. I'm not a spring chicken so this goes back awhile. Harry Truman was the Prez. when I was born.
Later BZ
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Earth
|
Squawker was indeed an old word for a midrange driver but it was never all that common and I seldom see it any more. Some old-timers still use it though.
http://www.alkeng.com/klipsch.html "Crossover rates are 6 dB / Octave on the woofer. 12 dB / Octave on the squawker and 18 dB / octave on the tweeter." |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Another american term fallen by the wayside is referring
to the treble part of a twin cone as a "whizzer". the animal origins of the other terms are obvious, this one for its origin has me stumped. (All I can think of is the paper rolled up tube childrens toy) And to disagree with HDTVman the term "squawker" which seemed to be used only in american product descriptions was a source of some amusement to us Brits. I assure you it was fairly common in american loudspeaker descriptions lifted into the "UK hifi yearbook" of days gone old. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
I am so glad to hear squawker again.
I am in favour of the three animal system. Can't really be sure why it fell out of favour. When I was but a wee lad it was woofer, squawker, tweeter. In fact midrange sounded kind of weird back then but soon became popular. And now?... no squawker But alas, the evolution of a language. Cal Hey sreten, I guess I better catch up. What is a whizzer called now? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
a "whizzer".
Another possible derivation is fireworks. Nowadays twin-cone, bi-cone, dual-cone and passive tweeter (less so) are common. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
'Squawker' was also used by Phillips many years ago for their midranges. Now a days the word squawk has a really rough sounding connotation to it. 'He squawked like a chicken' come to mind. Would you want to listen to something that squawked?
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09009 seconds (79.57% PHP - 20.43% MySQL) with 9 queries |