Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th March 2004, 12:38 AM   #1
DeonC is offline DeonC  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
DeonC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kimberley, South-Africa
Question To Kuei Yang Wang, re. XL Baffle

Hi Kuei

Just two quick question regarding XL Baffle, both concerning the 'Height above floor (mm)' parameter:

1. Is this measured at the centre of the cone, or at the bottom of the driver's chassis?

2. How is this parameter and the predictions that come from it affected if you slope the baffle backwards (for example at a slant of 20 degrees from verticle)? This will surely smooth the upper-bass midrange response not so? And how will it affect low-end response?

Ok, that was more than just two questions, but thanks anyway.

Thanks,
Deon
__________________
Reality is not digital, an on-off state, but analog.
Terry Pratchett - Moving Pictures
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 10:12 AM   #2
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
ThorstenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
Default Re: To Kuei Yang Wang, re. XL Baffle

Konnichiwa,

Quote:
Originally posted by DeonC
1. Is this measured at the centre of the cone, or at the bottom of the driver's chassis?
Centre.

Quote:
Originally posted by DeonC
2. How is this parameter and the predictions that come from it affected if you slope the baffle backwards (for example at a slant of 20 degrees from verticle)?
That is not modelled or accounted for at all.

XLbaffle offers a first order approximation, not "absolute fact" data, take it's output as a general guide and allow plenty of error margin. It was designed more to illustrate trends than to produce absolute data.

That "edge.exe" thing is much more accurate than XLbaffle.

Sayonara
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 11:50 AM   #3
Svante is offline Svante  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Svante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Default Re: Re: To Kuei Yang Wang, re. XL Baffle

Quote:
Originally posted by Kuei Yang Wang
Konnichiwa,

That "edge.exe" thing is much more accurate than XLbaffle.

Dunno about that, Edge does not model room reflections at all, just the baffle edge diffraction effects.
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 02:00 PM   #4
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
ThorstenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
Default Re: Re: Re: To Kuei Yang Wang, re. XL Baffle

Konnichiwa,

Quote:
Originally posted by Svante
Dunno about that, Edge does not model room reflections at all, just the baffle edge diffraction effects.
Okay, then let's say that what "The Edge" (can I have this one Super Supreme please?) models what it does model considerably more accuratley than XLBaffle.

Do you think the math in the Edge could be "convoluted" sufficiently to give a single excel worksheet row per frequency? Then I'd update XLBaffle and XLBox with that math (full crdit to you for this of course)....

Sayonara
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 04:51 PM   #5
Svante is offline Svante  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Svante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: To Kuei Yang Wang, re. XL Baffle

Quote:
Originally posted by Kuei Yang Wang

Do you think the math in the Edge could be "convoluted" sufficiently to give a single excel worksheet row per frequency?
A quick and dirty excel hack, you'll have to expand it here and there, but you get the idea:

http://www.tolvan.com/edge/QuicknDirtyEdge.xls
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kuei Yang Wang's 6sn7 linestage Yaho Tubes / Valves 4 24th March 2008 07:35 PM
Linestage suggestion for Kuei Yang Wang's phonostage Yaho Tubes / Valves 5 12th February 2008 09:06 PM
PING- Kuei Yang Wang Magnetar Multi-Way 21 23rd November 2005 05:44 PM
Yet another new Gainclone (YANG?) jtsjf Chip Amps 6 8th November 2004 10:02 PM
A question for Kuei Yang Wang Igla Multi-Way 3 12th July 2003 11:59 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.09399 seconds (78.26% PHP - 21.74% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio