Dayton Audio RS180-4_RS28A

[vulejov]

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/293045-monacor-dt-350nf-2.html#post4803710

 

[xrk971]

Kind of similar - silk and paper vs aluminum.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/297171-rs28f-rs180p-b80-hole-filler-3-way.html

This is the test XO in minidsp. I will be making a passive xo next. Also, this is the 2 way part of a 3 way. The mid is one of your favorites: B80.

WG300 fitted on the RS28F:

Dual PR's on back:

 

[Godzilla]

Very cool!

 

[vulejov]

Kind of similar - silk and paper vs aluminum..
..mid is one of your favorites: B80..

I have no doubts.. silk is history..
Thinking about RS225-8_RS52AN-8_RAAL 64-10..

 

[xrk971]

What's wrong with silk?

 

[vulejov]

What's wrong with silk?

Boring sound without fine details..
Transducer-Lab have very good explanation about silk on their site..

 

[vulejov]

Little bit different XO..

 

[vulejov]

Measurements with final XO..

 

[vulejov]

Small change in XO..
Tried different tuning, position..

 

[augerpro]

I understand you are going for higher slopes, but that still seems like a lot of components to me. And what's with the textbook type values and Zobel? Modern software should let you dispense with all that and model just the components you need with just the values you need. My .02 anyway...

 

[vulejov]

I understand you are going for higher slopes, but that still seems like a lot of components to me. And what's with the textbook type values and Zobel? Modern software should let you dispense with all that and model just the components you need with just the values you need. My .02 anyway...

There is no way to get 'higher slopes' without using 'lot of components'..
Values are appropriate for purpose..

 

[vulejov]

Nothing changed in XO last two weeks, BR tuning fixed at 47 Hz..

 

[dotneck335]

Bi-amp!!

 

[vulejov]

Bi-amp!!

???