|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
In another thread that I almost hi-jacked Sreten posted this picture. I'd like to know how the cross-sectional area is determined in a design like this. It seems like a very narrow pipe. In back-loaded horns the top of the pipe starts out similar to this but gets wider as it nears the terminus.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
I'd suggest the intention is for each vertical section to be
narrower, as you move towards the terminus. But by introducing a shielded bass driver they had to tweak the first divider giving a line profile not in any textbook. You can't see the half depth of the box but I estimate the CSA of the line to be ~ = to Sd of the bass driver, in the first section of the line. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Thanks, I thought that it was about Sd but it's hard to tell from the picture. I'll have to play around with this. Folks seem to like little boxes.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Hmm, all I can do is lay a scale on the screen, but it sure appears to be a constant cross section from the first fold to the terminus, and once you subtract out the drivers, probably the first section also. The terminal cup/XO causes a constriction in the pipe, though how much of one depends on how dense the foam is.
Anyway, more than likely it was determined by the decades old rule-of-thumb to make the line's effective cross sectional area = Sd, but as MJK's work has shown, this isn't the Hot Ticket to good overall performance for most drivers. As for short, well this just means a relatively high Fb if it's not reverse tapered. Browse MJK's TL design tables to get some idea where to start. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I played around with So and SL equal to Sd and got some unpleasant results. I'll keep trying.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Try whatever the max flat Vb is for whatever Fb you chose.
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I am done with AES -- a short rant. | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 48 | 14th April 2012 03:17 AM |
| Interest in ZV4 short run? | Michael Rothacher | Group Buys | 38 | 6th December 2005 11:46 PM |
| Best driver for short TL | MikeFarad | Multi-Way | 9 | 10th March 2004 10:54 AM |
| How short can a TL be..? | Ian J | Multi-Way | 10 | 31st March 2003 01:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07364 seconds (75.17% PHP - 24.83% MySQL) with 11 queries |