|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
Last year I built the Pro 13 Kit using Audax's TWO25A16 tweeter and HM130CO bass/mid. The design when finished sounded good and was slightly coloured in the bass, which at low SPLs gave good detail and character for a small speaker - 8 litre enclosure.
The problem I encountered was that when I introduced even moderate volume in bass passages (not necessarily very low, but energetic) the bass driver would clap out violently. After trying a reduced internal volume and extending the port vent, I resorted to using a 250uf bipolar capacitor in series with the inductor. This fixed the clapping out behaviour but to the detrement of the low end character that the speaker originally exhibited. I didn't mind as most of my subsequent listenning has been in a second system with the assistance of a 300mm Audax sub and they performed admirably in that set up. I have loaned them to a friend to use and he actually had borrowed them prior in their original configuration. He has no sub and is dissappointed this time around as he really enjoyed them in their original form. I can rewire them back to their original configuration, however, my question is if I reduce the value of the capacitor in series, will that take me back toward what I had originally? Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
You would have to increase, not reduce, the capacitor value to increase the bass. The greater the capacity the closer you would get to the original.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
Thanks Bill,
Obviously I got the advise to use the 250uf cap and it did work in filtering the bass. Any suggestion as to the value of the cap in series that would get me some way back to what I had? Cheers, Keith |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
Depends upon the impedance of the woofer. 1000mfd might get you close.
But, face it, you probably were just exceeding the speakers limitations. Maybe your friend wouldn't be so heavy handed with the volume control and you could leave out the cap altogether. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
1000uF sounds the right ballpark.
Suggest you use 4 x 250uF in parallel with one speaker and experiment till you get the right value, then you''ll know how many 250uF's you need. For this sort of alignment its normal to tune the reflex port higher than usual so it booms a little, the series capacitor will then bring the bass back to flat - retuning the port should allow the use of the smallest series capacitor without losing too much bass, whilst maximising low bass rejection. The technique is not used often due to the cost of decent capacitors (a parallel film type bypass will improve midrange) but was exploited in the original Wharfedale Diamond. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
Thanks for the info Sreten and Bill. I'll experiment with the port and the additonal capacitors and see what results I get. I could return to the original configuration easily, however, the volume levels at which the bass driver clapped out were not high at all. In their original form, about 98% of the music content was fine accept for the odd deep or energetic bass passage that would cause the bass driver to go into maximum excursion.
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
Turning down the bass control on the pre would accomplish pretty much the same thing and no need to fool around with caps.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Good point. With your average Baxendall bass controls should approximately work as it has a variable turn over frequency. (Unlike Baxendall treble controls) It will be less effective, but will help. As with the capacitors, higher tuning of the port will allow a little more bass cut to be applied (some bass cut will be needed unlike the flat case) without losing too much bass. If you go this way I suggest shorten the standard port length by half - this will give a 3dB peak at 100Hz - which corrected by the tone controls should give higher power handling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Quick off the mark and quite true, however I've since edited my post Turning up the bass on my suggested misalignment is not a good idea. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Audax Sd value | Svante | Multi-Way | 6 | 28th April 2004 10:46 PM |
| Problem with Audax Pro 13 Kit - Fixed! | phibes | Multi-Way | 4 | 6th March 2004 08:04 PM |
| Diy Audax | sma | Multi-Way | 13 | 12th February 2004 06:44 AM |
| son audax | sma | Multi-Way | 0 | 27th December 2003 11:40 AM |
| Audax HT | xr628 | Multi-Way | 1 | 16th January 2002 07:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11702 seconds (81.74% PHP - 18.26% MySQL) with 11 queries |