Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th February 2004, 02:59 PM   #1
rabbitz is offline rabbitz  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
rabbitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Default Time Alignment on a flat baffle.....

1st order crossovers are much better with time aligned drivers so I'm looking for a solution so I can still have a flat and not a stepped or sloping (10-15°) baffle.

I saw this idea for the tweeter (see pic) but I'm not sure whether you'd get some horn loading and also diffraction problems with this. I'd also have to have the woofer protruding from the baffle by about 16mm (a round spacer the same diameter as the woofer). Is this a problem as currently it is flush?

Or is this going to cause more problems than it cures?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg coaxalign.jpg (18.9 KB, 684 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 04:48 PM   #2
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
The truth is that many of these factors are just not audible in practise. While is is commendable to aim for perfection, it can sometiimes be a source of needless worry and wasted time

I had a speaker design with the tweeter mounted in it a separate housing which could be moved back and forward. I played around with it for ages but never did hear any difference.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 04:59 PM   #3
Bricolo is offline Bricolo  France
diyAudio Member
 
Bricolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
why don't you want an angled bafle?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 05:04 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Zappa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Québec
With all my apologies, Nuuk, I presently prototype a 2 way with a mobile tweeter enclosure and it makes much difference to move it forth or back by 1/2 inch. Hint: you can easyly percieve the lobing from the listening position. The effect for a given move length of the driver (in this case, the tweeter) increase with the crossover frequency.

Rabbitz, given the crossover frequency is in the 2k range, I don't think any horn loading is to appear in your case.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 05:12 PM   #5
Guss is offline Guss  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Guss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal
With the woofers coil moving forth and back all the time is it really worth wasting some time to align the drivers to perfection???
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 05:49 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Bill Fitzpatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
Quote:
Originally posted by Guss
With the woofers coil moving forth and back all the time is it really worth wasting some time to align the drivers to perfection???
Now that's a REALLY good question.

It seems that if nothing else, the excursion of the woofer will be responsible for "modulated lobing" and "modulated on axis frequency response" in the area of the crossover frequency.

Another good reason for a 2 way system actively crossed to woofers somewhere around 120Hz.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 06:09 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
I was gonna say the same thing about doing a three way. But I have my tweeters in a separate enclosure and moving these back and forth doesnt seem to do much either to the sound. WHen simulating it makes a HUGE difference in the reverse null and a bit of difference in the non reverse.

I am all for time aligning but!, doesnt the amount you have to offset things differ with different crossover freqeuncies. I seem to remember linkwitz saying something about this, calculating time delay for the 4th order at the 1.5khz or so at with the orien.

Also how do you find out where the exact acoustic centres of drivers are? This need to be VERY accurate for LSPCAD pro altering things by half millimeters makes quite big differences.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 06:30 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Bill Fitzpatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
According to Richard Heyser in one of his JAES papers, the acoustic center of a driver varies with frequency. This makes the time alignment solution much more difficult.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 06:41 PM   #9
Ken L is offline Ken L  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: deep south
Default Re: Time Alignment on a flat baffle.....

Quote:
Originally posted by rabbitz
have the woofer protruding from the baffle by about 16mm (a round spacer the same diameter as the woofer).
I would think that moving the woofer forward slightly is more likely to benefit than have a negative effect in regards to time alignment.Many "time aligned" designs place the tweeter slightly to the rear - moving the tweeter _forward_ is the way you wouldn't want to go.

this is not my area of expertise, however - I remember other posters making comments to the effect that the higher in hz you go the less important it is -

Again, if I remember correctly, this is only pertinent to within 1/2 of a wavelength (1/4 wavelength + or - a paticular wavelength)

Time wise, my guess is that you're OK.

I'm more concerned about protruding 5/8 of an inch - and don't really know, but I bet that's a little bit of a problem - whether it's audible or not, I just don't know, but that is something that probably needs to be looked at -

Regards

Ken L
__________________
No longer powered by Linux - not enough apps and cross platform integration - but maybe one day
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2004, 06:50 PM   #10
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
Quote:
With all my apologies, Nuuk, I presently prototype a 2 way with a mobile tweeter enclosure and it makes much difference to move it forth or back by 1/2 inch.
I bow to your superior hearing I guess it will also depend on factors like tweeter type/quality and crossover frequency.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY Time Alignment. clipto333 Car Audio 32 4th January 2011 05:48 AM
Time alignment circuit? Bad silver Car Audio 4 30th January 2007 08:00 AM
time alignment? flaevor Multi-Way 7 18th August 2006 12:51 PM
is doing time alignment now a waste of time? Beggar Multi-Way 9 28th July 2003 05:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Page generated in 0.11866 seconds (83.23% PHP - 16.77% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio