|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
1st order crossovers are much better with time aligned drivers so I'm looking for a solution so I can still have a flat and not a stepped or sloping (10-15°) baffle.
I saw this idea for the tweeter (see pic) but I'm not sure whether you'd get some horn loading and also diffraction problems with this. I'd also have to have the woofer protruding from the baffle by about 16mm (a round spacer the same diameter as the woofer). Is this a problem as currently it is flush? Or is this going to cause more problems than it cures? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
The truth is that many of these factors are just not audible in practise. While is is commendable to aim for perfection, it can sometiimes be a source of needless worry and wasted time
I had a speaker design with the tweeter mounted in it a separate housing which could be moved back and forward. I played around with it for ages but never did hear any difference.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
why don't you want an angled bafle?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
With all my apologies, Nuuk, I presently prototype a 2 way with a mobile tweeter enclosure and it makes much difference to move it forth or back by 1/2 inch. Hint: you can easyly percieve the lobing from the listening position. The effect for a given move length of the driver (in this case, the tweeter) increase with the crossover frequency.
Rabbitz, given the crossover frequency is in the 2k range, I don't think any horn loading is to appear in your case. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal
|
With the woofers coil moving forth and back all the time is it really worth wasting some time to align the drivers to perfection???
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
Quote:
It seems that if nothing else, the excursion of the woofer will be responsible for "modulated lobing" and "modulated on axis frequency response" in the area of the crossover frequency. Another good reason for a 2 way system actively crossed to woofers somewhere around 120Hz. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I was gonna say the same thing about doing a three way. But I have my tweeters in a separate enclosure and moving these back and forth doesnt seem to do much either to the sound. WHen simulating it makes a HUGE difference in the reverse null and a bit of difference in the non reverse.
I am all for time aligning but!, doesnt the amount you have to offset things differ with different crossover freqeuncies. I seem to remember linkwitz saying something about this, calculating time delay for the 4th order at the 1.5khz or so at with the orien. Also how do you find out where the exact acoustic centres of drivers are? This need to be VERY accurate for LSPCAD pro altering things by half millimeters makes quite big differences.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
According to Richard Heyser in one of his JAES papers, the acoustic center of a driver varies with frequency. This makes the time alignment solution much more difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: deep south
|
Quote:
this is not my area of expertise, however - I remember other posters making comments to the effect that the higher in hz you go the less important it is - Again, if I remember correctly, this is only pertinent to within 1/2 of a wavelength (1/4 wavelength + or - a paticular wavelength) Time wise, my guess is that you're OK. I'm more concerned about protruding 5/8 of an inch - and don't really know, but I bet that's a little bit of a problem - whether it's audible or not, I just don't know, but that is something that probably needs to be looked at - Regards Ken L
__________________
No longer powered by Linux - not enough apps and cross platform integration - but maybe one day |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Quote:
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY Time Alignment. | clipto333 | Car Audio | 32 | 4th January 2011 05:48 AM |
| Time alignment circuit? | Bad silver | Car Audio | 4 | 30th January 2007 08:00 AM |
| time alignment? | flaevor | Multi-Way | 7 | 18th August 2006 12:51 PM |
| is doing time alignment now a waste of time? | Beggar | Multi-Way | 9 | 28th July 2003 05:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11866 seconds (83.23% PHP - 16.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |