|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Recently i have been toying around with doing a push-pull-push-push TL sub design. On this forum this topography was brought up. The only downside to this design is you have the speaker baskets sticking out of the enclosure. I was just wondering if somthing like this would still work. I'm thinking that a possible reason it may not work is that there is a much greater air volume between the two drivers as opposed to the original design where they are facing eachother. I'm thinking the two paris of drivers would be in a sonotube that fits snugly around the circumfrence of the driver. Is this just a dumb idea, or is there a chance something like this would work?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
It will work just as well as the other arrangement.
Though why you'd use isobaric in a t/l has me mystified. A push pull pair would seem to be the most sensible. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well i have 16 of these 10'' drivers sitting around my house, i got them for about $5 each. I'm really looking for some way to use them up. I read that having this configuration helps cancels out any non-linearitis in the speaker, so I mighnt as well use 4 even if there is only a marginal improvement in sound.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
A single pair in push pull will cancel non linearities.
Have you the specs of the drivers ? some are much more suited to isobaric pairing than others. You can use 2 isobaric pairs in the same box as a single driver, but a t/l would need 2 x the area. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Build it. I want to know how it turns out because I have a dozen (!) drivers lying around doing nothing. I'd like to try something using two drivers in tandem somehow. So, if yours is successful, then mine will be too. If yours fails, then I'll learn at least one thing NOT to do. Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
I am unfamiliar with TL dimensioning though, I would have thought that it would have worked just as with the box. How is the cross-sectional area usually selected in a TL? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
here is a link to the specs I think i read that the cross sectional area of the transmission line should be between 100% and 125% of the drivers surface area.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
*Power Handling: 30 watts RMS/60 watts max *VCdia: 1" *Le: 1.50 mH *Znom: 8 ohms *Re: 7.20 ohms *Frequency range: 44-2,000 Hz *Fs: 44 Hz *SPL: 92 dB 2.83V/1m *Vas: 3.57 cu. ft. *Qms: 5.80 *Qes: .90 *Qts: .78 *Xmax: 3 mm *Driver Dimensions: A: 10-1/4", B: 9-3/8", C: 4".
Well thats a whopping Vas for a 10" driver with a 0.8 Qts. And Xmax is not impressive. Sensistivity is pretty good. What do you expect for $5 dollars ? How to use them effectively is a major issue. Reflex is out of the question, except at huge cabinet volumes. Sealed box possibly, in isobaric configuration, but tight bass is not on the agenda unless you use a Linkwitz transform. I'd say twin 4x10 open baffles for low power valve equipment, assymetrically crossed over to an open baffle full ranger around 92dB/W, such that the bass has already lost 6dB. For all sixteen units possibly twin opposed paired 4 x 10 arrays, similar to the SL6 dipole subwoofer, but I readily admit the theory of such units has me somewhat perplexed. (Push pull can be easily used in dipoles, isobaric has no advantage) |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Sealed box is possible but you need an amplifier with
low crossover frequencies to roll the sub off early. Volumes are for one driver or 2 x isobaric pairs. Optimum volume = ~ Vas. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I always figured that OB subs would have to be huge, im not sure if i have that much space for speakers to take up. Maby since their qts is near .76 i could just do an IB experiment with 4 or so of the drivers along with the TL.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Push-Push or Push-Pull | Bigun | Subwoofers | 56 | 9th March 2009 01:24 AM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| help tuning push-push ApexJr super 8 woofer | planet10 | Subwoofers | 22 | 28th September 2005 04:00 AM |
| Photos - My first T-Line Push-Push Subwoofer :) | Xmax BR | Subwoofers | 6 | 23rd June 2005 08:17 PM |
| Double push-pull versus single push-pull | jraraujo | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 19th October 2002 12:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11228 seconds (81.36% PHP - 18.64% MySQL) with 11 queries |