Qb and Vb in acoustic suspension systems - Page 2 - diyAudio
 Qb and Vb in acoustic suspension systems
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Re: Re: Qb and Vb in acoustic suspension systems

Quote:
 Lower Qts by a negative series resistance ...
Yes, that is also an option. But this is an electronic option to lower Qe. Did some experiments with it and yes that works. But it has a big drawback. The voice coil will heat up, rising Qe again (because Re rises). Since you are working now with the difference of resistances, this difference can change severe and is quite audible. A proper tuned system becomes boomy after playing some time at high level because of the heating of the voice coil.

Using a LW transform works much better then or otherwise the way to go can be MFB. But that is not an easy way.

Cheers

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Re: Re: Qb and Vb in acoustic suspension systems

Quote:
 Originally posted by sreten Qb is always greater than Qts. Your other suppositions are entirely incorrect, because for a start your equation is wrong : Qb/Qts = root (Vas/Vb+1) (Qb/Qts)^2 = Vas/Vb +1 Vas/Vb = (Qb/Qts)^2 - 1 Vb= Vas/ [(Qb/Qts)^2- 1] the first equation tells you : for Vb = Vas Qb = 1.414Qts for Vb = 1/3 Vas Qb = 2Qts. the other rearrangements tell you the same thing in reverse. There are no restrictions on the value of Qts, which in practise can vary between 0.1 and 2, Though for bass units the range is usually 0.20 to impractically high values above 0.7 up to 1. (unless open baffle or car free air mounting) sreten.

Both of our equations are one and the same:

Vb = Vas / [Qb/Qts)^2 - 1]

expands to...

Vb = Vas / [(Qb^2/Qts^2) - 1]

For a flat response the exact value of Qb = (square root 2)/2, which is about 0.707, the commonly accepted value.

__________________
KTK. Kool To the Kore.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Re: Re: Re: Qb and Vb in acoustic suspension systems

Quote:
 Originally posted by coolkhoa Both of our equations are one and the same: Vb = Vas / [Qb/Qts)^2 - 1] expands to... Vb = Vas / [(Qb^2/Qts^2) - 1] For a flat response the exact value of Qb = (square root 2)/2, which is about 0.707, the commonly accepted value.
apologies again...., they are equivalent. sreten.

 23rd February 2004, 12:10 AM #14 Wizard of Kelts diyAudio Moderator Emeritus   Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State Having heard of negative series resistance, but not knowing what it is, I did a quick look on Google. After all, it has been mentioned as a way to lower Qts and, by extension, Qtc. I found that while it is possible to do, if also makes an amp vulnerable to oscillation. Since the whole idea of lowering Qts is to give a more controlled, snappier sound, it would seem to me that the solution is just transferring the problem from the speaker side to the amplifier side. Am I right on this? __________________ "A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Quote:
 Originally posted by kelticwizard Having heard of negative series resistance, but not knowing what it is, I did a quick look on Google. After all, it has been mentioned as a way to lower Qts and, by extension, Qtc. I found that while it is possible to do, if also makes an amp vulnerable to oscillation. Since the whole idea of lowering Qts is to give a more controlled, snappier sound, it would seem to me that the solution is just transferring the problem from the speaker side to the amplifier side. Am I right on this?
You are right in that a negative output impedance of an amplifier may lead to stability problems, but usually it does not go that far. Obviously, this series resistance may *never* be lower than Re, but that is never required. The main problem is that the resistance of the voice coil is temperature dependent, this leads to a Qes that varies with the temperature (= power) of the voice coil. This is a problem in any speaker, but is worstened by a negative series resistance.

Still, you have the box stuffing option, if Qts is 0.7+
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Re: Qb and Vb in acoustic suspension systems

Quote:
 Originally posted by coolkhoa So we never see a driver with Qts equal to or greater than 0.707. In a sealed box, such a driver will never be able to attain a "flat" response!

Allow me to correct myself. Such drivers do exist, but they are not practical for hi-fi, namely low-fi Goldwoods. That's why Parts Express says that their T/S parameters "make them great for automotive environments."

Consider that some of Goldwood's woofers have Qts of 0.81, 0.83, 0.88, and (get this) 1.69!

But the statement still applies: these drivers will never be able to attain an optimally flat response.
__________________
KTK. Kool To the Kore.

 27th February 2004, 04:26 AM #17 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: USA, MN You can make an amp with negative output impedance and make a "maximally flat" system out of a speaker with Qts greater than 0.7. You can also make a linkwitz transform and change the overall Q and F3 to whatever you want....within reason. "Optimally flat" has a different connotation to an engineer. Optimum is a relative term, and it depends on the metric used. 10 different people, when asked to come up with an optimum solution, will likely make 10 different choices. I have heard a system with Qtc=1.3 in a car, and it sounded perfectly fine, especially with the techno the guy liked to listen to. The metric in this case was to maximize trunk space.... Expand your horizons.... __________________ Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Quote:
 Optimum is a relative term, and it depends on the metric used.
I fully agree, since the expression "optimum" means the best possible compromise (in terms of cost, size, technical feasibility, taste, ....) for a specific application.

Regards

Charles

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Cal Weldon Multi-Way 26 19th December 2005 05:46 AM BAM Multi-Way 4 23rd October 2003 04:38 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:26 AM.