|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Does anyone have an example of a what I assume to be a 4th order electrical, 6th order acoustical xo that consists of only one cap, one resistor and one inductor? Would the inductor be in series and the cap and resistor in parallel after the inductor? Just guessing.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: deep south
|
But I don't think you've got a 6th order crossover there.
common crossovers are going to have more than three parts when you get past first order. http://ccs.exl.info/calc_cr.html This crossover calculator will give you some examples of various orders Regards Ken L
__________________
No longer powered by Linux - not enough apps and cross platform integration - but maybe one day |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
resistors are for damping or sensitivity adjustment. For tweeters its series cap, parallel inductor,series cap, parallel inductor. For bass units its series inductor, parallel cap, series inductor, parallel cap. For high order crossovers component matching is critical. And they simply won't work properly with any short cuts in the design process, e.g. assuming a resistive load. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Hmmm...I think I'll go back to the source on this one. Is it possible to achieve a 6th order rolloff if you hit the drivers upper impedance rise just right with a minimal crossover?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle or Shanghai
|
Here you go...
http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/281-XO.pdf The solution is a full 6th order solution, symmetric. It is from our KIT281 speaker set. When talking about crossover slopes for speakers, unless otherwise specified assume they are talking about the final ACOUSTIC slope, since that is really what matters. In this case, we only needed a 2nd order electrical slope to yield a full 6th order acoustic slope from the AV8 woofers. This matched the tweeter (with it's 4th order electrical, 6th order acoustic) quite well... Dan Wiggins Adire Audio |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Thanks Dan. That's the one. I should've remembered that since I built some 281s a while back.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Czech Republic
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? | alexclaber | Multi-Way | 11 | 4th January 2008 07:15 PM |
| deceptive perception ? 1st order-2nd order question | poldus | Multi-Way | 4 | 10th April 2007 11:58 PM |
| My 1st order butterworth filter better than 4th order L-R: Why? | philipreji | Solid State | 61 | 1st March 2007 04:50 PM |
| 2nd Order Tweeter + 3rd Order Woofer = OK? | Jay | Multi-Way | 3 | 12th September 2005 12:12 PM |
| 1st Order Tweeter, 3rd Order Woofer? | Jay | Multi-Way | 8 | 8th May 2004 09:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09267 seconds (76.11% PHP - 23.89% MySQL) with 10 queries |