Nice design!!! Its good to see someone else besides myself using those two drivers ��
Very complex passive crossover though, I just stole the Vib130TL design and added an inductor.
I am now in the process of converting to active filtration and multiple amplifiers.
Any other details you can share?
Very complex passive crossover though, I just stole the Vib130TL design and added an inductor.
I am now in the process of converting to active filtration and multiple amplifiers.
Any other details you can share?
Hi, how do you like the sound? I plan to make their couplet kit which uses 2 AL130. Why did you put tweeter off center?
nice work,
re:"The human ear or hearing sense does not recognize phase.." - makes what a lot of guys are doing with their xovers here pointless.... 😉
re:"The human ear or hearing sense does not recognize phase.." - makes what a lot of guys are doing with their xovers here pointless.... 😉
Hi,
The x/o looks overcomplicated for purpose.
There are likely simpler very useable options.
rgds, sreten.
The x/o looks overcomplicated for purpose.
There are likely simpler very useable options.
rgds, sreten.
Sounds great.. some day I will try 2xAL130_KE25SC..
Frequency response looks better in Boxsim with tweeter ex-center..
Purpose was to let AL130 work up to 3kHz and kill resonance at 7-8kHz.. only possible with 4th order xover..
I don't like simple and useable options..
If you do not understand how the xover works it is not my problem..
It is not overcomplicated, every single component have purpose..
Here is for example xover with and without additional filters on the coils..
Attachments
Hi,
If you don't understand the alternatives and proper
4th order L/R acoustic targets it is your problem.
Your x/o is overcomplicated and not ideal.
rgds, sreten.
If you don't understand the alternatives and proper
4th order L/R acoustic targets it is your problem.
Your x/o is overcomplicated and not ideal.
rgds, sreten.
The worst kind of people is the one that criticizes but does not know or does not want to give advice..
If my xover is overcomplicated let me know what component is unnecessary, or what would you do differently..
Just my 2 pence
The values of capacitors aren't right in my diagram, but note the single coil I added to the Visaton circuit.
The vib130tl circuit is here:
http://www.visaton.com/en/bauvorschlaege/2_wege/vib130_tl/construction.html
Its simpler and kills the breakup of the AL130 well enough)
Its basically the Vib130TL circuit, with an added coil shunting the LP circuit to notch the breakup. Seems to do OK. Would be easy to try if you have spare components 🙂
Designing a 4th order ELECTRICAL crossover was too problematic and almost unnecessary in my opinion
The values of capacitors aren't right in my diagram, but note the single coil I added to the Visaton circuit.
The vib130tl circuit is here:
http://www.visaton.com/en/bauvorschlaege/2_wege/vib130_tl/construction.html
Its simpler and kills the breakup of the AL130 well enough)
Its basically the Vib130TL circuit, with an added coil shunting the LP circuit to notch the breakup. Seems to do OK. Would be easy to try if you have spare components 🙂
Designing a 4th order ELECTRICAL crossover was too problematic and almost unnecessary in my opinion
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.