|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Copenhagen
|
Hi all,
When searching this forum and on the web in general it seems that the T/S parameters published by Peerless are far from accurate. It seems strange that one of the largest manufacturers of DIY speaker units does not provide the DIY community with a better basis to successfully create the results that they are looking for Does anybody know if there is a list or a site that publishes actually measured parameters? I’m especially interested in the CSX and the HDS series. Thanx, Henrik |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have also read about the discrepancy of measured and published specs of Peerless drivers.
I have three different drivers from Peerless. CSX 850146 12 inch XLS 12 inch 830537 CC line. All have measured specs quite comparable to the published ones. The XLS in particular was very close. The 850146 spec is somewhere on this forum. I put it up with the published specs. Do a '850146 " search. It's possible that some drivers may have had a problem . I think it should not be extended to all their drivers. I think their drivers are great value for money ! Some are probably better value than other brands at many times their price. Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
Please note that the T/S parameters are highly dependent on the signal amplitude used when they are measured. You need to use very small signal levels to get linear parameters. Also it's alvays a nice idear just measure the impedance and "fit" the paramaters to the measured curve. Hope it helps \Jens |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rural NY
|
FWIW, I purchased seven HDS439's a few years ago. When I measured them, using Speaker Workshop, most of the parameters, were reasonably close (within 10%). Fs was higher (around 20%) than spec, but was done with only a day or two of cone break-in (10Hz sine). The key was, they were consistant among the seven. From memory, the variance was less than 5%. From what I have heard, its common for many manufacturers, for speaker parameters to be off by 20%, and some even more.
__________________
JohnSz |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Copenhagen
|
It seems that I shouldn't be that concerned after all with the CSX and HDS series
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TS parameters and specs for these drivers??? | Bull | Multi-Way | 1 | 9th March 2011 12:15 PM |
| Fostex FE167E Actual TS Parameters? | reikso2h | Full Range | 5 | 28th June 2008 09:27 PM |
| Parameters for drivers | iwahn | Subwoofers | 0 | 20th June 2007 09:13 PM |
| Ts parameters and multiple drivers | bigmike216 | Multi-Way | 8 | 3rd October 2004 09:38 PM |
| T/S parameters for drivers in parallel | teodorom | Multi-Way | 2 | 23rd April 2004 05:36 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08455 seconds (74.61% PHP - 25.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |