|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Well chaps, it's Sunday so how about some pictures?
I have finally got rid of my rather utilitarian baffles and replaced them with something a bit more at home in a living room. ![]() There are more pictures and a description HERE on Decibel Dungeon.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford, England
|
Nuuk,
What (super)tweeter do you have there? How is the 'great dipole woofer' search going? Ian |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Hi Ian,
It's just a cheapish silk dome which comes in at around 14K. I am going to try a second pair firing backwards. The best option for the woofers still appears to be the Alpine SWE 1250 which is around 53UKP. I am still looking......
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denmark
|
Have you considered the Neo3 ribbontweeter, would make a perfect openbaffle match... It would be a shame though to cut it off that high...
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford, England
|
Nuuk,
Came across John Kreskovsky's new design the other day. This U-frame idea looks interesting in that only one driver would be necessary, though I don't know if the requirements on driver Q would be relaxed (and of course the driver he uses isn't easily available in the UK...). If I read correctly he says the cardiod should sound similar to a dipole as they're both 'velocity source' rather than 'pressure source' systems. Must think about this... Ian |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Quote:
The priority is to extend the bottom end.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Quote:
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Nice woodwork! I just wonder; how did you go about when you decided the shape of the baffle?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Quote:
I wanted the solid part of the baffle as narrow as possible so the width was set at the diameter of the main driver plus the depth of the slots for the glass. Luckily, this coincided with the width of two of the flooring panels used to make the front of the panels. The height (and top curve) was based on drawing an arc from the centre of the main driver, where the radius was the distance from the centre of the driver to the closest edge of the baffle. This resulted in the height of the baffles being some 120mm less than that of my prototype baffes and as I have found there to be a slight reduction in bass, I think that I should have made them a bit taller but that's DIY hi-fi! As I am adding woofers anyway, it is not the end of the world ![]() The dimensions of the 'glass wings' were chosen to produce a slightly wider baffle than the prototypes and I just chose to put a quarter round on each corner.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Spain
|
Hi Nuuk,
Beautifull looking speakers. Congrats. Regards Miguel |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 15 | 19th May 2012 03:12 PM |
| Open-baffle baffle length | matejS | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st September 2010 04:49 PM |
| Murphy baffle radios [ open baffle ] | keithpeter | Full Range | 10 | 11th September 2007 07:59 PM |
| what effect does baffle have on open-baffle system? | kappa546 | Multi-Way | 6 | 24th January 2006 10:21 PM |
| Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) | tktran | Multi-Way | 13 | 29th November 2004 11:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10850 seconds (78.84% PHP - 21.16% MySQL) with 10 queries |