Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th January 2004, 02:21 PM   #1
static is offline static  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto
Default Tweeter protection Cap

Hi

I would like to protect my tweeter, as I plan to go from passive X-over to an active one.
So I'd like to slap a good quality film cap on both tweeters.
The question is what value should it be? These are two ways with X point @ 3kHz, so ideally i'd probably want the cap to filter out anything else below like 1kHz or so (suggestions?)

I remember reading that Peter Daniel has a single cap on his tweeter, what value is it?

Thanks
Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 02:39 PM   #2
tiroth is offline tiroth  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Ideally you would want the corner to be at least 2 octaves below crossover, unless you are using it as a pole in the real crossover network of course. So, corner at 750Hz would be ideal, 1kHz should be fine if that is what you have the parts for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 02:47 PM   #3
static is offline static  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto
wow - that was a quick one

well, the figure of 1kHz I just guesstimated

So what value of the cap should i get for 750Hz, as per your recommendation?
Also what brand: i was looking at Auricap and more $$$ Hovlands.
Do Hovlands make a noticable difference?

Thanks
Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 04:20 PM   #4
Pan is offline Pan  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Not that I´ve done it myself but it really makes sense to use the DC blocking cap as a pole together with the active.

You can use a smaller cap, which means higher quality for the same money.

/Peter
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 04:30 PM   #5
tiroth is offline tiroth  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
The only downside to using the cap as a pole is that the pole will vary as the tweeter's impedance varies, throwing away some of the benefit of going active. It's cheaper though.

For a tweeter that doesn't dip below 7 ohms you would need a cap of (2*pi*750*7)^(-1) or ~30uF.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 05:23 PM   #6
static is offline static  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto
sorry guys, but you will have to be a little patient with me

First of all can anyone explain the "pole" cap concept? Never heard about it, unfortunately.

30uF!?! are you sure? Then how can 20Hz make it through a 2.2uF DC blocking cap almost unaffected (not rolled off). I will have to pay dearly for a very good quality 30uF cap.

Thanks
Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 06:17 PM   #7
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
Then how can 20Hz make it through a 2.2uF DC blocking cap almost unaffected (not rolled off).
Because it's working with a much higher impedance.

Quote:
For a tweeter that doesn't dip below 7 ohms you would need a cap of (2*pi*750*7)^(-1) or ~30uF.
If you look at the figure 7 in the formula, that's the 7 Ohms of the tweeter.

BTW...If you don't have DC at the output of your tweeter amp then I don't see any point in using a blocking cap for the tweeter.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 07:32 PM   #8
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally posted by fdegrove
BTW...If you don't have DC at the output of your tweeter amp then I don't see any point in using a blocking cap for the tweeter.

Cheers,
Protects the tweeter against a DC amplifer fault, sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 08:52 PM   #9
Pan is offline Pan  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
"Protects the tweeter against a DC amplifer fault, sreten."

Girly girly...

/Peter
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2004, 09:06 PM   #10
static is offline static  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto
Thanks for the explanation on capacity and impedance. It all makes sense now.

Quote:
Girly girly...
thats unless you have $$$$ tweeters in your speakers.
Since I have $20 tweeters in mine, i guess i can avoid the cap.

Sorry for the bother.
Alex
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tweeter protection in an active speaker Cousin Billy Multi-Way 12 23rd April 2009 02:03 AM
Tweeter protection gizmo for active XO? JoeM Solid State 5 31st March 2009 08:18 AM
Protection capacitor for tweeter in active speaker oceanic30 Multi-Way 11 30th July 2007 02:15 PM
Tweeter protection for software crossovers? JoeM Multi-Way 6 28th October 2006 04:38 AM
Tweeter protection for active speakers paulspencer Multi-Way 31 26th October 2005 08:40 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Page generated in 0.13263 seconds (74.32% PHP - 25.68% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio